BCIvsGSGETF Comparison
ETF 1
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
-0.09%
VS
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust ETF (GSG) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. BCI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.75% for GSG. BCI is up 35.09% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.02B in YTD flows. GSG performs better with 60.21% YTD performance, and -$466M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCI and GSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCI vs GSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCI GSG | -1.03%+3.06% | +12.26%+16.80% | +35.09%+60.21% | +40.19%+63.21% | +55.68%+64.43% | +64.44%+106.65% |
| Flows | BCI GSG | +$32M-$63M | +$742M-$34M | +$1.02B-$466M | +$1.20B-$462M | +$2.10B-$523M | +$2.37B-$1.18B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCI GSG | +13.44%+21.51% | +18.15%+26.04% | +14.52%+20.10% | +16.51%+22.62% |
| Max drawdown | BCI GSG | -5.32%-8.39% | -14.33%-18.66% | -14.33%-18.66% | -26.07%-28.91% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCI GSG | 22d26d | 105d106d | 105d106d | 1323d1359d |
Trading data
BCI | GSG | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.26 | $36.95 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $26.34 | $37.04 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BCI | GSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCI | GSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.26 | $36.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | -0.24% |
| AuM | $3.55 B | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.26% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCI
Data will be available soon
GSG
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BCI
Data will be available soon
GSG
Data will be available soon
Diversification
BCI
Data will be available soon
GSG
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BCI
Data will be available soon
GSG
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BCI and GSG
How have the BCI and GSG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, BCI is up 35.09% year-to-date (YTD), while GSG has returned 60.21%. That puts GSG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCI or GSG?
Year-to-date, the BCI ETF saw +$1.02B in flows, compared to -$466M for GSG.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCI or GSG?
Over the past year, BCI had a volatility of 18.15%, while GSG experienced 26.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCI or GSG?
As of October 16, 2026, BCI holds $3.55 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSG manages $1.04 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about BCI & GSG
Advertisement
