Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BCGDvsEMXCETF Comparison
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. BCGD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, EMXC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Materials. BCGD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.25% for EMXC. BCGD is down -1.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. EMXC performs better with 12.1% YTD performance, and +$1.57B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCGD and EMXC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BCGD vs EMXC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCGD EMXC | -3.28%-3.08% | -0.20%+14.77% | -1.98%+12.10% | n/a+53.81% | n/a+83.83% | n/a+54.51% |
| Flows | BCGD EMXC | +$3K+$622M | +$7M+$1.79B | +$4M+$1.57B | --$3.68B | -+$7.62B | -+$11.01B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCGD EMXC | +15.28%+20.98% | n/a+16.60% | n/a+14.00% | n/a+14.40% |
| Max drawdown | BCGD EMXC | -6.20%-9.76% | n/a-10.84% | n/a-17.95% | n/a-28.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCGD EMXC | 40d14d | n/a35d | n/a256d | n/a898d |
BCGD | EMXC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.13 | $78.25 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $24.62 | $81.35 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BCGD | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BCGD | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.13 | $78.25 |
| 1D performance | -1.99% | -3.81% |
| AuM | $6.94 M | $16.87 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.25% |
BCGD | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Baron Capital | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index |
| N° of holdings | 32 | 581 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2025 | July 18, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BCGD and EMXC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BCGD is down -1.98% year-to-date (YTD), while EMXC has returned 12.1%. That puts EMXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCGD or EMXC?
Year-to-date, the BCGD ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$1.57B for EMXC.
Which ETF is bigger: BCGD or EMXC?
As of March 10, 2026, BCGD holds $6.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while EMXC manages $16.87 B.
What sectors do the BCGD and EMXC ETFs invest in?
BCGD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, EMXC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the BCGD ETF and EMXC ETF?
BCGD top holdings include US8740391003, NVIDIA and AMAZON.COM INC. EMXC holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and SK HYNIX.
Which ETF is more diversified: BCGD or EMXC?
BCGD holds 35 securities with 61.39% of its assets in the top 15. EMXC has 639 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.36%.
There's an ETF For That? Emerging Markets, Ex-China
Ask the Manager: Michael Baron on the Case for Active Management
Baron Capital Debuts Three Active ETFs on NYSE
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
