New

Global ETF Survey Is Live! 600+ ETF Professionals Weigh In. See Results →

Advertisement
Advertisement

BATTvsURAETF Comparison

ETF 1
BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
+0.65%
VS
ETF 2
URA

Global X Uranium ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
+0.65%

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. BATT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.69% for URA. BATT is down -3.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -15.14% YTD performance, and +$887M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BATT and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

BATT vs URA performance and flow charts

Performance

-15.0-10.0-5.00.0%Sep 28Oct 5Oct 12Oct 19Oct 26

Cumulative Flows

-10 M0 M10 M20 M30 M40 MSep 28Oct 5Oct 12Oct 19Oct 26

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
BATT
URA
-7.71%-9.62%
-4.79%-6.57%
-3.32%-15.14%
+0.61%-30.03%
+43.59%+62.17%
-21.02%+61.28%
Flows
BATT
URA
-$3M-$8M
-$7M+$52M
+$11M+$887M
+$14M+$1.65B
-$26M+$2.60B
-$23M+$3.52B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
BATT
URA
+23.81%+38.34%
+27.50%+43.72%
+24.32%+37.49%
+24.96%+36.74%
Max drawdown
BATT
URA
-20.90%-29.44%
-28.05%-44.05%
-31.73%-44.05%
-60.61%-44.05%
Max drawdown duration
BATT
URA
62d62d
168d273d
571d273d
1646d273d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
BATT
URA
Last sale
10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
$13.27
$36.55
Previous close
10/28/2026
$13.20
$35.86
Consolidated volume
10/28/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
BATT
URA
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BATT
URA
Last price
$13.27
$36.55
1D performance
+0.53%
+1.92%
AuM$100.55 M$5.08 B
E/R0.59%0.69%
Characteristics
BATT
URA
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderAmplify ETFsGlobal X
BenchmarkEQM Lithium & Battery Technology IndexSolactive Global Uranium Index
N° of holdings--
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJune 6, 2018November 4, 2010
ESGYesNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

BATT
Data will be available soon
URA
Data will be available soon

Sectors

BATT
Data will be available soon
URA
Data will be available soon

Diversification

BATT
Data will be available soon
URA
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970
BATT
Data will be available soon
URA
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BATT and URA

How have the BATT and URA ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 28, 2026, BATT is down -3.32% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -15.14%. That puts BATT better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BATT or URA?

Year-to-date, the BATT ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$887M for URA.

Which ETF is more volatile: BATT or URA?

Over the past year, BATT had a volatility of 27.5%, while URA experienced 43.72%.

Which ETF is bigger: BATT or URA?

As of October 28, 2026, BATT holds $100.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.08 B.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

Global ETF Survey 2026