BATTvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. BATT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.52% for NLR. BATT is down -4.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -23.24% YTD performance, and +$761M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BATT and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BATT vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BATT NLR | -8.74%-8.64% | -8.05%-13.58% | -4.40%-23.24% | -0.54%-33.69% | +41.20%+51.33% | -21.08%+89.88% |
| Flows | BATT NLR | -$2M-$90M | -$6M-$214M | +$12M+$761M | +$16M+$1.12B | -$25M+$3.84B | -$22M+$3.91B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BATT NLR | +24.10%+37.88% | +27.48%+38.80% | +24.32%+33.15% | +24.96%+28.15% |
| Max drawdown | BATT NLR | -20.90%-27.90% | -28.05%-44.30% | -31.73%-44.30% | -60.61%-44.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | BATT NLR | 61d61d | 167d272d | 571d272d | 1646d272d |
Trading data
BATT | NLR | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $13.27 | $95.99 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $13.20 | $94.92 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BATT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BATT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $13.27 | $95.99 |
| 1D performance | +0.53% | +1.13% |
| AuM | $100.74 M | $3.19 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.52% |
Characteristics
BATT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | VanEck |
| Benchmark | EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | - | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 6, 2018 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BATT
Data will be available soon
NLR
USA
48.42%
Canada
19.33%
Australia
8.86%
Other
23.38%
Sectors
BATT
Data will be available soon
NLR
Energy
42.29%
Utilities
28.82%
Industrials
23.77%
Other
5.12%
Advertisement
Diversification
BATT
Data will be available soon
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
81.93%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BATT
Data will be available soon
NLR
Constellation Energy Corp.
8.67%
Cameco Corp.
7.99%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
6.18%
Fortum Oyj
5.79%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
5.39%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.32%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
5.15%
Centrus Energy Corp.
5.12%
Denison Mines Corp.
5.11%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.57%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.56%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.30%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.27%
Oklo, Inc.
3.88%
Frequently asked questions about BATT and NLR
How have the BATT and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, BATT is down -4.4% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -23.24%. That puts BATT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BATT or NLR?
Year-to-date, the BATT ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$761M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: BATT or NLR?
Over the past year, BATT had a volatility of 27.48%, while NLR experienced 38.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: BATT or NLR?
As of October 27, 2026, BATT holds $100.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $3.19 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about BATT & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
Tesla’s Rally Propels Consumer Discretionary Index and EV ETFs
July 8, 2024
BATT
Tesla’s Rally Propels Consumer Discretionary Index and EV ETFs
July 8, 2024
BATT
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
BATT
Advertisement
