ARPvsCSHIETF Comparison
PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. ARP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.88%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. ARP is up 13.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$1.22B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ARP and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ARP vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ARP CSHI | +0.47%+0.38% | +4.28%+1.07% | +13.64%+3.83% | +17.45%+4.95% | +57.48%+16.75% | n/an/a |
| Flows | ARP CSHI | +$1M+$184M | +$4M+$563M | +$16M+$1.22B | +$18M+$1.35B | +$38M+$1.83B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ARP CSHI | +8.33%+0.23% | +14.72%+0.53% | +11.11%+1.10% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | ARP CSHI | -2.81%n/a | -10.08%-0.18% | -10.08%-1.52% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ARP CSHI | 13dn/a | 68d6d | 68d20d | n/an/a |
ARP | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.23 | $49.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $34.31 | $49.60 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
ARP | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.23 | $49.59 |
| 1D performance | -0.22% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $74.49 M | $2.02 B |
| E/R | 1.88% | 0.38% |
ARP | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | PMV Capital | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 22, 2022 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |