Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AMOMvsFQALETF Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. AMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FQAL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. AMOM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.15% for FQAL. AMOM is up 2.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. FQAL performs worse with -1.69% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AMOM and FQAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AMOM vs FQAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AMOM FQAL | -3.38%-2.24% | +0.28%-1.29% | +2.22%-1.69% | +34.29%+17.51% | +85.82%+72.83% | +57.22%+77.19% |
| Flows | AMOM FQAL | -+$108K | +$5M+$12M | +$5M+$8M | -$6M-$51M | +$6M+$527M | +$18M+$616M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AMOM FQAL | +22.39%+11.41% | +25.23%+16.80% | +23.03%+13.97% | +23.48%+16.22% |
| Max drawdown | AMOM FQAL | -6.71%-4.10% | -15.45%-12.41% | -30.25%-16.70% | -39.47%-25.39% |
| Max drawdown duration | AMOM FQAL | 14d15d | 37d45d | 253d126d | 843d750d |
AMOM | FQAL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.86 | $74.29 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $49.74 | $75.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AMOM | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AMOM | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.86 | $74.29 |
| 1D performance | -1.77% | -1.46% |
| AuM | $28.61 M | $1.14 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.15% |
AMOM | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Qraft AI ETFs | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 119 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2019 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AMOM and FQAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, AMOM is up 2.22% year-to-date (YTD), while FQAL has lost -1.69%. That puts AMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AMOM or FQAL?
Year-to-date, the AMOM ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$8M for FQAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: AMOM or FQAL?
Over the past year, AMOM had a volatility of 25.23%, while FQAL experienced 16.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: AMOM or FQAL?
As of March 11, 2026, AMOM holds $28.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while FQAL manages $1.14 B.
What sectors do the AMOM and FQAL ETFs invest in?
AMOM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FQAL focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the AMOM ETF and FQAL ETF?
AMOM top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and TESLA. FQAL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: AMOM or FQAL?
AMOM holds 48 securities with 55.13% of its assets in the top 15. FQAL has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.59%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
