AGRWvsSCHGETF Comparison
VS
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. AGRW's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, SCHG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. AGRW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. AGRW is up 6.86% year-to-date (YTD) with -$23M in YTD flows. SCHG performs better with 9.2% YTD performance, and +$5.86B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AGRW and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
AGRW vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AGRW SCHG | -2.13%-1.26% | +4.38%+5.80% | +6.86%+9.20% | +3.66%+7.23% | n/a+104.54% | n/a+83.20% |
| Flows | AGRW SCHG | +$671K+$823M | +$1M+$1.56B | -$23M+$5.86B | -$22M+$6.85B | -+$20.76B | -+$24.18B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AGRW SCHG | +16.50%+15.42% | +17.46%+16.75% | n/a+19.68% | n/a+22.69% |
| Max drawdown | AGRW SCHG | -6.09%-5.74% | -16.52%-16.35% | n/a-23.41% | n/a-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | AGRW SCHG | 20d21d | 189d188d | n/a193d | n/a754d |
Trading data
AGRW | SCHG | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:46 PM | $32.59 | $35.56 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $32.59 | $35.50 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
AGRW
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexAGRW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:46 PM
Live
Closed
AGRW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.59 | $35.56 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | +0.17% |
| AuM | $113.74 M | $63.78 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
AGRW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Allspring | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 187 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2025 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
AGRW
USA
96.05%
Other
3.95%
SCHG
USA
98.24%
Other
1.76%
Sectors
AGRW
Technology
65.2%
Healthcare
9.09%
Industrials
8.57%
Finance
7.09%
Other
10.06%
SCHG
Technology
56.16%
Healthcare
9.96%
Finance
8.13%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.23%
Other
18.52%
Advertisement
Diversification
AGRW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
62.83%
SCHG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
61.95%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
AGRW
NVIDIA Corp.
15.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
8.52%
Broadcom Inc.
4.70%
Apple, Inc.
4.40%
Microsoft Corp.
4.18%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.18%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.41%
Lam Research Corp.
2.75%
Arista Networks, Inc.
2.54%
Visa, Inc.
2.52%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.41%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.18%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.15%
ServiceNow, Inc.
2.13%
Amphenol Corp.
1.63%
SCHG
NVIDIA Corp.
10.61%
Apple, Inc.
9.36%
Microsoft Corp.
7.51%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.18%
Broadcom Inc.
3.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.21%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.57%
Visa, Inc.
2.51%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.47%
Tesla, Inc.
2.31%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.91%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.67%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.57%
Frequently asked questions about AGRW and SCHG
How have the AGRW and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, AGRW is up 6.86% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has returned 9.2%. That puts SCHG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AGRW or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the AGRW ETF saw -$23M in flows, compared to +$5.86B for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: AGRW or SCHG?
Over the past year, AGRW had a volatility of 17.46%, while SCHG experienced 16.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: AGRW or SCHG?
As of October 26, 2026, AGRW holds $113.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $63.78 B.
What sectors do the AGRW and SCHG ETFs invest in?
AGRW leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the AGRW ETF and SCHG ETF?
AGRW top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. SCHG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: AGRW or SCHG?
AGRW holds 47 securities with 62.83% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 188 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.95%.
Advertisement
Latest news about AGRW & SCHG
Advertisement
Advertisement
