ACESvsURAETF Comparison
VS
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ACES's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. ACES is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.69% for URA. ACES is down -5.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -5.36% YTD performance, and +$835M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACES and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACES vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACES URA | -11.66%-7.70% | -13.94%-28.43% | -5.25%-5.36% | +8.86%+3.32% | -32.52%+113.48% | -53.47%+155.43% |
| Flows | ACES URA | -$2M+$36M | +$2M-$100M | +$10M+$835M | +$8M+$1.86B | -$201M+$2.82B | -$322M+$3.90B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACES URA | +38.75%+44.22% | +34.75%+44.82% | +34.78%+36.38% | +36.51%+37.49% |
| Max drawdown | ACES URA | -28.59%-33.01% | -28.59%-36.85% | -57.14%-36.85% | -74.39%-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACES URA | 55d82d | 55d180d | 1092d180d | 1729d738d |
Trading data
ACES | URA | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 5:39 PM | $30.31 | $38.80 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $30.74 | $40.32 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACES | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 5:39 PM
Live
Closed
ACES | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.31 | $38.80 |
| 1D performance | -1.40% | -3.77% |
| AuM | $109.97 M | $5.63 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACES
USA
85.31%
Canada
9.61%
Other
5.09%
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
Sectors
ACES
Industrials
36.16%
Utilities
26.81%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.11%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.26%
Other
15.65%
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.02%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ACES
Tesla, Inc.
5.76%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.69%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
5.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
5.10%
Nextpower, Inc.
4.86%
Northland Power, Inc.
4.85%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.71%
Albemarle Corp.
4.66%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
4.61%
First Solar, Inc.
4.53%
Itron, Inc.
4.45%
Plug Power, Inc.
4.43%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
4.18%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.65%
Boralex, Inc.
3.13%
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about ACES and URA
How have the ACES and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, ACES is down -5.25% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -5.36%. That puts ACES better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACES or URA?
Year-to-date, the ACES ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$835M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACES or URA?
Over the past year, ACES had a volatility of 34.75%, while URA experienced 44.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACES or URA?
As of July 27, 2026, ACES holds $109.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.63 B.
What sectors do the ACES and URA ETFs invest in?
ACES leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the ACES ETF and URA ETF?
ACES top holdings include Tesla, Inc., Rivian Automotive, Inc. and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.. URA holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACES or URA?
ACES holds 38 securities with 70.02% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACES & URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
ACES
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
ACES
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
ACES
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
ACES
Advertisement
