ACESvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ACES's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. ACES is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.52% for NLR. ACES is down -8.45% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. NLR performs better with -7.79% YTD performance, and +$890M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACES and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACES vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACES NLR | -8.97%-4.16% | -18.78%-5.26% | -8.45%-7.79% | +2.13%-5.22% | -24.93%+84.30% | -55.24%+129.76% |
| Flows | ACES NLR | -$6M-$47M | -$3M-$232M | +$11M+$890M | +$15M+$2.09B | -$188M+$3.98B | -$331M+$4.04B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACES NLR | +31.99%+36.61% | +35.01%+39.48% | +34.93%+32.61% | +36.71%+27.65% |
| Max drawdown | ACES NLR | -20.28%-19.34% | -31.13%-36.67% | -50.49%-36.67% | -74.39%-36.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACES NLR | 80d82d | 101d226d | 985d226d | 1775d226d |
Trading data
ACES | NLR | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.67 | $113.22 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $29.77 | $117.83 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACES | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACES | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.67 | $113.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.34% | -3.91% |
| AuM | $107.74 M | $3.98 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.52% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACES
USA
83.76%
Canada
10.62%
Other
5.62%
NLR
USA
51.08%
Canada
18.8%
Australia
7.41%
Other
22.71%
Sectors
ACES
Industrials
33.06%
Utilities
28.88%
Consumer Cyclical.
12.82%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.84%
Other
16.41%
NLR
Energy
39.26%
Utilities
31.2%
Industrials
23.85%
Other
5.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.11%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
83.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ACES
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
6.12%
Itron, Inc.
5.97%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.82%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
5.61%
Northland Power, Inc.
5.58%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
4.99%
Tesla, Inc.
4.96%
Albemarle Corp.
4.73%
First Solar, Inc.
4.72%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
4.36%
Nextpower, Inc.
4.27%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.19%
Plug Power, Inc.
3.92%
Boralex, Inc.
3.69%
The Andersons, Inc.
3.17%
NLR
Constellation Energy Corp.
9.13%
Cameco Corp.
7.79%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
7.24%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.17%
Fortum Oyj
5.91%
Centrus Energy Corp.
5.69%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.27%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.88%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.87%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.61%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.53%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.45%
Oklo, Inc.
4.39%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.37%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.04%
Frequently asked questions about ACES and NLR
How have the ACES and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, ACES is down -8.45% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -7.79%. That puts NLR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACES or NLR?
Year-to-date, the ACES ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$890M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACES or NLR?
Over the past year, ACES had a volatility of 35.01%, while NLR experienced 39.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACES or NLR?
As of September 11, 2026, ACES holds $107.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $3.98 B.
What sectors do the ACES and NLR ETFs invest in?
ACES leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACES ETF and NLR ETF?
ACES top holdings include HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., Itron, Inc. and Rivian Automotive, Inc.. NLR holds in its top three: Constellation Energy Corp., Cameco Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACES or NLR?
ACES holds 38 securities with 72.11% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 83.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACES & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
ACES
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
