AAVMvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (AAVM) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. AAVM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. AAVM is up 14.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. QDPL performs worse with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AAVM and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
AAVM vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AAVM QDPL | +0.13%+1.34% | +1.78%+1.65% | +14.66%+12.06% | +21.14%+15.84% | +66.23%+73.85% | +38.34%+75.18% |
| Flows | AAVM QDPL | +$339K+$35M | +$1M+$119M | +$4M+$300M | +$3M+$420M | -$17M+$1.37B | -$21M+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AAVM QDPL | +11.13%+10.24% | +16.01%+11.68% | +16.27%+13.54% | +15.49%+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | AAVM QDPL | -4.37%-2.82% | -10.81%-8.32% | -19.91%-17.47% | -23.66%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | AAVM QDPL | 60d53d | 46d70d | 204d126d | 1067d704d |
Trading data
AAVM | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.88 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $33.87 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
AAVM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexAAVM | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
AAVM | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.88 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $26.76 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
AAVM | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Alpha Architect | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 3, 2017 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
AAVM
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
AAVM
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
AAVM
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
AAVM
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about AAVM and QDPL
How have the AAVM and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, AAVM is up 14.66% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts AAVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AAVM or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the AAVM ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: AAVM or QDPL?
Over the past year, AAVM had a volatility of 16.01%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: AAVM or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, AAVM holds $26.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about AAVM & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
