Create, analyze, optimize your ETF portfolio. Start now →
Escalating tensions between the U.S., Israel, and Iran have brought the Strait of Hormuz and the shipping industry into focus. Here are two ETFs investors can use to express their convictions.


Keep up with what matters in ETFs
Get timely ETF insights, market trends, and top ideas straight to your inbox.
Your newsletter subscriptions with us are subject to ETF Central's Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
The outbreak of hostilities between the U.S. and Israel versus Iran has triggered a wave of effects, but one of the most consequential is the status of maritime shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. At its tightest point, it is only about 33 kilometers wide, with shipping lanes that are even narrower.
Roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes through this corridor each day, along with liquefied natural gas and other energy products from producers such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar. It is one of the most critical energy choke points in the world.
Because it is so geographically constrained, it is also highly vulnerable. Disruptions do not require a full-scale naval blockade. Mines, drone attacks, missile strikes, or even the credible threat of interdiction can be enough to send insurers, tanker operators, and freight markets into disarray.
In response to strikes on military installations and nuclear facilities and the reported killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other regime officials, Iran has threatened to interdict vessels entering the strait.
The U.S., in turn, has signaled that it would deploy naval escorts to ensure the continued flow of tankers. Meanwhile, concerns are rising that some insurers may refuse to cover cargo transiting the area, which alone can sharply increase shipping costs.
The most immediate market reaction has been in crude oil, which has surged to fresh recent highs around $75 per barrel. Energy equities and defense stocks have benefited, particularly producers operating in more geopolitically stable regions such as the Permian Basin and Canada.
For ETF investors, however, there is another angle. A small lineup of niche ETFs allows investors to express a direct macro view on shipping dynamics and freight rates themselves.
Still, for those looking to translate a geopolitical thesis into a targeted position, there is indeed an ETF for shipping. Two of the more notable ones come from Amplify ETFs. Here’s what you need to know.
Stay in the loop — get the latest ETF insights: trends, analysis, and expert picks.
The first ETF worth looking at is BWET, which focuses specifically on crude oil tanker freight rates. While some readers may have traded shipping stocks such as ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, BWET is fundamentally a very different type of product.
BWET does not hold shipping companies. Instead, it holds positions in freight futures tied to the cost of transporting crude oil across global shipping routes.
The ETF tracks the future price of crude oil shipping. Normally, accessing these markets requires a margin account and significant capital to trade freight derivatives directly. By packaging them inside an ETF, BWET makes this exposure accessible to ordinary investors.
BWET is designed to track the Breakwave Tanker Futures Index. About 90% of the portfolio is allocated to very large crude carrier (VLCC) freight futures. VLCCs are the largest tankers in operation and are commonly used to move crude oil from the Middle East and the Americas to Asia.
The remaining 10% of the portfolio consists of Suezmax tanker freight futures. These ships are roughly half the size of VLCCs and are commonly used on Atlantic routes. They are also notable because they are the largest tankers capable of transiting the Suez Canal.
The portfolio itself is laddered across futures contracts one to six months forward, with a weighted average expiration of roughly 60 to 90 days. If you look at the holdings, you might see something like a position labeled TD3CFFA207KT Middle East Gulf to China USD/MTM March 26.
In plain language, this refers to a forward freight agreement tied to the TD3C route, which tracks the cost of shipping crude oil on a VLCC from the Middle East Gulf to China. Traders use these contracts to hedge or speculate on future tanker rates along one of the world’s busiest crude shipping corridors.
Because it is tied directly to freight futures, BWET is an extremely volatile ETF. All else being equal, it tends to perform well when tanker demand surges, when oil trade flows increase, or when shipping routes become disrupted and freight rates spike.
Unsurprisingly, year-to-date as of February 28, 2026, BWET is up 198.96% on a net asset value basis. Geopolitical disruptions such as the current conflict in the Middle East tend to be supportive for tanker rates because they increase shipping risk, lengthen routes, and tighten available vessel supply.
That said, the same dynamics can reverse quickly. BWET can surprise to the downside when oil demand weakens, when shipping bottlenecks ease, or when geopolitical tensions subside and trade routes normalize. Freight markets are notoriously cyclical and prone to sharp reversals.
There are also a few structural considerations investors should be aware of. First, the ETF is expensive. BWET currently carries a 3.5% expense ratio. That figure already reflects fee waivers from Breakwave and the sponsor agreeing to absorb certain expenses to cap costs at that level. After December 31, 2026, that cap may be removed, which means the total cost of ownership could rise further.
Second, BWET issues a Schedule K-1 rather than the standard Form 1099-DIV. This is because the fund is structured as a commodity pool partnership. Instead of reporting simple dividend income, investors receive a K-1 that details their share of the fund’s gains and losses from the underlying futures positions. For the 2025 tax year, investors should expect to receive their K-1 by the end of 2026.
The counterpart to BWET is BDRY, which focuses on dry bulk shipping. While BWET tracks tanker freight rates tied to crude oil transport, BDRY targets the cost of shipping bulk commodities such as iron ore, coal, grains, and other raw materials.
Like BWET, BDRY does not hold shipping companies. Instead, it gains exposure through freight futures contracts that track the cost of chartering dry bulk vessels across major global routes. The structure is similar, but the composition of the underlying contracts differs to reflect the dry bulk shipping market.
Roughly 50% of the portfolio is allocated to Capesize 5TC futures. Capesize vessels are the largest standard dry bulk carriers and are primarily used for transporting iron ore along long-haul routes.
Another 40% is allocated to Panamax 4TC contracts. Panamax vessels represent the largest ships able to transit the Panama Canal, making them a key workhorse for grain and coal shipments.
The remaining 10% is invested in Supermax 10TC contracts. These are medium-sized vessels equipped with onboard cranes, which allows them to load and unload cargo in ports that lack infrastructure.
Similar to BWET, the portfolio is laddered across one- to six-month freight futures, with a weighted average maturity of roughly 60 to 70 days.
Performance this year illustrates how different these markets can behave. BDRY has risen a strong 38.81% year-to-date, but that pales in comparison to the explosive rally in BWET.
The reason comes down to geography and cargo flows. Oil tankers are heavily exposed to routes that pass through the Strait of Hormuz, making them extremely sensitive to disruptions in the Persian Gulf.
Dry bulk vessels, by contrast, are often routed along longer global commodity corridors. Much of the trade runs from exporters such as the United States, Brazil, and Australia toward major importers like China, India, and parts of Europe.
In the case of Middle Eastern instability, many ships simply reroute around the Cape of Good Hope at the southern tip of Africa rather than transiting sensitive chokepoints. Because of that flexibility, dry bulk freight rates are less directly exposed to geopolitical tensions in the Gulf.
If your thesis centers specifically on disruptions to oil shipping routes, BDRY will likely be less sensitive than BWET, and the performance gap so far this year reflects that reality.
That said, BDRY remains extremely volatile. Since its inception on March 22, 2018, the ETF would have produced a cumulative loss of 51.46%. Freight markets are notoriously cyclical, swinging sharply with global trade volumes, commodity demand, and vessel supply.
Investors should also keep the structural considerations in mind. BDRY carries the same 3.5% expense ratio as BWET and also issues a Schedule K-1 instead of a standard Form 1099-DIV.
Please note this article is for information purposes only and does not in any way constitute investment advice. It is essential that you seek advice from a registered financial professional prior to making any investment decision.
Topics
See all
Segments
See all
Latest ETF News
See all ETF newsETF Comparison: Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) Versus Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR)


Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE): The Next Evolution of Structured Products


Advantages of ETFs over Mutual Funds1/6
Lower Costs
In this guide, we'll explore the advantages of ETFs over mutual funds, giving you valuable insights into why ETFs have gained significant popularity among investors like yourself.
Leveraged ETFs: Unlocking the Potential for Amplified Returns1/6
Understanding Leveraged ETFs
Explore leveraged ETFs: potential for amplified returns & risks. 5 ETFs to consider across equities, commodities & fixed income.
What is a Leveraged ETF?1/6
Introducing Leveraged and Inverse ETFs
In this guide, we'll dive into the world of leveraged ETFs, exploring their definition, mechanics, potential risks, and rewards.
Asset TV
The ETF Show - Investors Can Fight Healthcare Inflation with Newly Launched ETFs
Adam Schenck, Principal and Managing Director of Fund Services at Milliman joined The ETF Show to discuss Milliman's first ETFs designed to hedge against rising healthcare inflation.

ETF Trends
ETF Industry KPIs April 20, 2026
The ETF Industry saw 14 New Launches, 1 Ticker Change and 16 closures last week.

Asset TV
The ETF Show - Investors Run to Cash Alternatives as Markets Remain Volatile
Jason England, Portfolio Manager and Fixed Income Strategist from Simplify joined The ETF Show to discuss investor allocations to fixed income as markets continue on their rollercoaster ride.

ETF Trends
ETF Industry KPIs March 30, 2026
The ETF Industry saw 33 New Launches, 1 Ticker Change and 9 closures last week.

Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
