New

Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →

Advertisement
ETF Central logo
Advertisement
Contributor

Exploring the Nuanced Dynamics of AP Selection for ETF Issuers

Nicholas Phillips, an ETF industry veteran, shares his thoughts on authorized participants (AP) selection for ETF issuers, emphasizing the importance of capabilities, cost, and lead market makers (LMMs) partnerships.

Nicholas Phillips
By Nicholas Phillips · July 15, 2024
Share
Cover Image Wall Street

When selecting Authorized Participants (APs), ETF issuers navigate a complex landscape shaped by each AP's unique capabilities and their strategic relationships with Lead Market Makers (LMMs) and other market participants. APs vary significantly, and these differences can have a substantial impact on an ETF's market performance and operational efficiency.

Resources

Get data on 14,000+ ETFs

Access Trackinsight's reliable and comprehensive data with 500M+ points on 14,000+ ETFs.

Try for free

What are Authorized Participants?

Authorized Participants (APs) are firms that have the right to create and redeem shares of an exchange-traded fund (ETF). They play a critical role in ensuring ETF liquidity and price accuracy relative to the underlying assets. Typically, APs are large financial institutions, such as market makers or investment banks, which also often serve as APs for their own trading purposes, enhancing their capacity to manage ETF shares efficiently.

Choosing the Right Authorized Participants

APs differ in their access to various international markets and their associated costs, including commission fees which can vary by country. Some APs maintain their own presence, utilizing brokers across different regions, offering distinct advantages and challenges.

This diversity necessitates that issuers carefully choose APs based on specific needs, whether it's handling large orders, managing fixed-income or equity products, or navigating the complexities of international ETFs.

Cost vs. Service: Choosing the Right AP for ETFs

The cost implications of working with different APs are substantial. Some APs might offer lower fees but may lack comprehensive services that others provide for a higher fee. These financial nuances must be weighed against the service quality and the specific demands of the ETF being launched or managed.

APs & LMMs: A Key Partnership for ETF Liquidity

The relationship between APs and LMMs is crucial. LMMs may have preferences for certain APs based on past collaborations, efficiency in transactions, or ease of communication. A robust network between an issuer's APs and LMMs can enhance market maker participation, crucial for the ETF's liquidity and trading volume.

Beyond Functionality: Legal Considerations in AP Agreements

The interactions between trading firms, APs, and issuers often hinge on the specifics of compliance and legal agreements. The language in AP agreements can influence the operational dynamics, making the legal counsel's role pivotal in framing these relationships effectively.

Beyond Service: The Hidden Competition for Rebalance Flow

A significant yet often overlooked aspect of the ETF ecosystem is the competition for rebalance flow from issuers. Large-scale APs and LMMs value these orders highly as they represent lucrative opportunities. Relationships in this arena are not just built on service provision but also on mutual benefits over time. APs capable of handling more complex instruments like commodities, futures, options, and swaps are particularly valuable for intricate ETFs, further differentiating them in the market.

AP Limitations: Protecting Tracking Error and ETF Performance

Another critical aspect to consider is that some APs will not execute orders for creation and redemption across different trading dates. This limitation can significantly impact the tracking error of the ETF and disrupt hedges, potentially affecting the ETF's performance relative to its benchmark. Understanding these constraints is vital for issuers to manage risk effectively and ensure alignment with the ETF's investment objectives.

To Wrap Up…

For ETF issuers, understanding and navigating the complex interplay between AP capabilities, costs, legal frameworks, and strategic LMM relationships is crucial. These factors not only determine the immediate operational success of an ETF but also shape long-term strategic alliances within the capital markets ecosystem. Awareness of APs' operational constraints is essential for maintaining precision in tracking and hedging strategies.

About the Author

Nicholas Phillips | President of ETF Capital Markets Advisors LLC
With over 25 years of experience in ETF market making and capital markets, Nicholas Phillips is recognized as a subject matter expert in the ETF industry. He started his career spending the first ten years as a lead market maker for SIG and Goldman Sachs. At the helm of MCAP LLC's ETF Desk, Nicholas built and scaled the division, enhancing its operations through innovative pricing and risk models, and robust relationships with market makers and issuers. His tenure at Van Eck Associates as Director of ETF Capital Markets further solidified his expertise, managing critical facets of operations and deepening connections within the trading community. Beyond market making, Nicholas is an avid content creator, sharing insights that demystify complex market dynamics. He is keen on exploring board member roles that benefit from his extensive background and forward-thinking approach to ETF strategies. His dual US/Ireland citizenship complements his global perspective, enriching his professional endeavors in diverse markets.

Disclaimer

Please note this article is for information purposes only and does not in any way constitute investment advice. It is essential that you seek advice from a registered financial professional prior to making any investment decision.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF U
Become a better investor with NYSE: The Home of ETFs
Visit the ETF U homepage
ETF Guides
Advertisement

Recent educational content

The ETF Show - Rethinking the 60/40 with Alternatives, Thematics

Asset TV

The ETF Show - Rethinking the 60/40 with Alternatives, Thematics

Christian Magoon, Founder and CEO of Amplify ETFs joins The ETF Show to discuss how alternative strategies and thematics are replacing bonds in the 60/40 portfolio.

Asset TV
By Asset TV · March 19, 2026
Tidal ETF Industry KPIs

ETF Trends

ETF Industry KPIs March 16, 2026

The ETF industry saw 22 new launches and 1 closure last week.

Tidal
By Tidal · March 17, 2026
The ETF Show - Markets Remain Resilient Despite US-Iran War

Asset TV

The ETF Show - Markets Remain Resilient Despite US-Iran War

Simeon Hyman, Global Investment Strategist at ProShares joins The ETF Show to discuss the market reaction to the US-Iran war, the market rotation, and the need for quality in investor portfolios.

Asset TV
By Asset TV · March 13, 2026
The ETF Show - US-Iran Conflict Sends Oil ETFs Soaring

Asset TV

The ETF Show - US-Iran Conflict Sends Oil ETFs Soaring

Lance McGray, Managing Director and Head of ETF Product at Advisors Asset Management joins The ETF Show.

Asset TV
By Asset TV · March 6, 2026

Browse all educational columns

Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up