New

Ready-made ETF portfolios built for real investor needs. Explore now →

Advertisement
Advertisement
Smart Investing

ETF Comparison: Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) Versus Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR)

Both of these competing thematic ETFs provide landlord-like, tollbooth exposure to the real assets driving AI infrastructure development.

DTCR vs SRVR - ETF Comparison

Keep up with what matters in ETFs

Get timely ETF insights, market trends, and top ideas straight to your inbox.

Your newsletter subscriptions with us are subject to ETF Central's Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

Data centers have been everywhere in the headlines lately. The themes driving that attention go beyond just artificial intelligence (AI) demand.

Power is becoming a real constraint, with growing electrification needs putting strain on grids and raising the possibility of regulatory pushback, whether through higher costs or requirements for on-site generation. There’s also a social angle. Many of these developments are being built in less urban areas, where local resistance to large-scale infrastructure projects could slow expansion.

Even with those risks, the growth trajectory is hard to ignore. While most investors gravitate toward chipmakers or software companies building large language models, there’s another way to play it. Real estate investment trusts (REITs) that own and lease out these facilities effectively operate like tollbooths, collecting rent from hyperscalers and cloud providers that need the infrastructure to run.

That exposure is now available in ETF form through a more targeted set of real estate strategies. Two of the more focused options are the Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF

and the Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
SRVR
+1.69%
.

Both go beyond broad real estate sector funds to zero in on digital infrastructure tied to AI and data demand. Using data from the ETF Central comparison tool, here’s how they stack up.

DTCR vs SRVR Comparison

Resources

Get data on 14,000+ ETFs

Access Trackinsight's reliable and comprehensive data with 500M+ points on 14,000+ ETFs.

Try for free

DTCR vs. SRVR: Total Cost of Ownership

Thematic ETFs tend to come with higher price tags than broad market funds. DTCR charges a 0.50% expense ratio, while SRVR comes in one basis point lower at 0.49%. On a $10,000 investment, that works out to about $50 versus $49 per year. that’s a rounding error.

DTCR vs SRVR Metrics

Expense ratios aren’t the only cost to consider, though. If you’re trading these ETFs more actively, the bid-ask spread also matters. Here, DTCR has a slight edge, with a 30-day average spread of 0.213% compared to 0.226% for SRVR. Again, the difference is marginal.

DTCR vs SRVR - Trading data

Verdict: Once you factor in both fees and trading costs, you’re basically splitting basis points. Total cost of ownership is effectively identical, so this one is a tie.

DTCR vs. SRVR: Methodology and Holdings

Both ETFs are passive index trackers, but the benchmarks they follow take very different approaches for security selection and weighting.

DTCR vs SRVR - Characteristics

DTCR tracks the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. It’s a relatively concentrated portfolio of just 20 holdings, with a 0.86% trailing 12-month yield. The strategy goes beyond traditional real estate by including companies tied to the broader data center ecosystem. That means you’re not just getting landlords, but also exposure to semiconductor names that support the buildout.

SRVR, on the other hand, tracks the S&P Global Data & Infrastructure Real Estate Index, with a broader basket of about 50 holdings. It also offers a higher 2.69% 30-day SEC yield. The focus here is more squarely on real assets, with greater weight in real estate and some exposure to communications.

That difference shows up clearly in the portfolios. As expected, both ETFs have a heavy real estate focus, but DTCR is more heavily tilted toward U.S. companies and includes a meaningful allocation to technology names at over a quarter of its portfolio.

DTCR vs SRVR - Exposure

Both funds are top-heavy, but DTCR is more concentrated. Its top 15 holdings account for 84.86% of the portfolio, compared to 72.68% for SRVR.

DTCR vs SRVR - Diversification

There is overlap at the top, with Equinix, Digital Realty, American Tower, and Crown Castle featuring prominently in both. But gig into DTCR’s holdings and you’ll find companies like Micron, Intel, Taiwan Semiconductor, Broadcom, AMD, and Nvidia alongside the usual REIT suspects. SRVR stays closer to its lane, with a more global footprint, including names like China Tower.

DTCR vs SRVR - Holdings

Verdict: SRVR stands out to me as the cleaner digital real estate play. You’re getting higher yield, broader diversification, and less overlap with mega-cap tech names that investors may already own elsewhere.

DTCR vs. SRVR: Risk and Return

Over the trailing five-, three-, and one-year periods, as well as year-to-date, DTCR has outperformed SRVR. By stepping outside of real estate and into technology, it has benefited from the strength in semiconductors and AI-related infrastructure, while REITs have faced pressure from higher rates.

That positioning has also made DTCR the more popular fund, with consistent net inflows over the same periods. SRVR, in contrast, has seen net outflows despite its larger and more established portfolio.

DTCR vs SRVR - Performance and Flows

On the risk side, DTCR is more volatile across those same timeframes. That’s not surprising given its exposure to tech stocks, which tend to have sharper price swings.

However, when you look at drawdowns, SRVR has had its own issues. Peak-to-trough losses have, at times, been deeper and slower to recover, reflecting the more muted rebound profile of real estate compared to tech.

DTCR vs SRVR - Volatiltiy

Verdict: Objectively, DTCR gets the edge here. Higher returns have come with higher volatility, but the payoff profile has been more favorable, especially in a macro environment where tech has led and real estate has lagged.

Please note that this article reflects the author’s personal views and does not represent the opinions of the publication or its affiliates. It is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. It is essential to seek guidance from a registered financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF U
Become a better investor with NYSE: The Home of ETFs
Visit the ETF U homepage
ETF Guides
Advertisement

Recent educational content

Investors Can Fight Healthcare Inflation with Newly Launched ETFs

Asset TV

The ETF Show - Investors Can Fight Healthcare Inflation with Newly Launched ETFs

Adam Schenck, Principal and Managing Director of Fund Services at Milliman joined The ETF Show to discuss Milliman's first ETFs designed to hedge against rising healthcare inflation.

Asset TV
By Asset TV · April 22, 2026
Tidal ETF Industry KPIs

ETF Trends

ETF Industry KPIs April 20, 2026

The ETF Industry saw 14 New Launches, 1 Ticker Change and 16 closures last week.

Tidal
By Tidal · April 22, 2026
The ETF Show - Investors Run to Cash Alternatives as Markets Remain Volatile

Asset TV

The ETF Show - Investors Run to Cash Alternatives as Markets Remain Volatile

Jason England, Portfolio Manager and Fixed Income Strategist from Simplify joined The ETF Show to discuss investor allocations to fixed income as markets continue on their rollercoaster ride.

Asset TV
By Asset TV · April 15, 2026
Tidal ETF Industry KPIs

ETF Trends

ETF Industry KPIs March 30, 2026

The ETF Industry saw 33 New Launches, 1 Ticker Change and 9 closures last week.

Tidal
By Tidal · March 31, 2026

Browse all educational columns

Advertisement
Webcast on Demand

Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution

Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.

Accepted for 1 CE Credit

Calamos Webcast