New

Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →

Advertisement
ETF Central logo
Advertisement
Smart Investing

Death, Taxes, and the Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF pushes the paradigm on buffer ETFs and the depth of loss protection they can provide to investors.

Kyle Anthony Headshot
By Kyle Anthony · September 13, 2023
Share
Death, Taxes, and the Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF

Death and taxes are often considered the two certainties in life, but Innovator Capital Management is looking to add to this list with the recent launch of the Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF (TJUL), which aims to provide a 100% downside buffer over a two-year period. 

In this article we will highlight the value proposition and intended outcome of the ETF, explore the solution’s investment experience, and provide some noteworthy considerations for interested investors.

ETF Central Weekly Newsletter

Like what you're reading?

Stay in the loop — get the latest ETF insights: trends, analysis, and expert picks.

After signing up, you will receive occasional emails from ETF Central and its partners. See our Terms of use.

Value Proposition & Intended Outcome

The Innovator Equity Defined Protection will utilize FLexible EXchange® Options on the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust to fulfill its defined outcome strategy of providing a buffer against 100% of underlying ETF losses, while capping upside return at 16.62%, over a 2-year period. 

Source: Innovator ETFs

While the ‘100% loss protect’ aspect of the solution is eye-catching in nature, looking at the historical 2-year rolling return data of the S&P 500 Index provides clarity regarding the feasibility of the fund’s claim. 

Source: Innovator ETFs

As observed from the chart, and generally understood by investors, losses do occur over a long investment period – but severe losses are very infrequent in nature and the returns of equity markets tend to be positively skewed in the long run. While the use of derivates to manage risk exposure will facilitate the strategy’s loss-protection objective, the relatively low frequency in which negative returns do occur over a rolling two-year period provides a baseline understanding of the solution’s ability to fulfill its 100% downside buffer. It is important to note, there is no guarantee the ETF will be successful in providing the sought-after protection. 

The chart also highlights the other aspect of the solution’s offering – capping returns to 16.62%. As seen from the chart the average positive return of the index is 32%, which means that capping returns is potentially leaving money on the table. But let’s take an alternative perspective when considering the cap rate. TJUL’s stated focus is on a 2-year time frame. If investors were to instead invest their monies in a 2-year U.S. Treasury Instrument, what would they yield during said period? As seen in the following chart, approximately 5% in our prevailing interest rate environment, but would that vary depending on the time frame in question?

Against the backdrop of a market environment that currently has elevated interest rates and strong equity market performance, the value proposition of the ETF is its ability to provide a measure of safety, while also allowing for some equity-market upside participation. Though investors are knowingly giving up some returns, the knowledge of avoiding losses is a compelling notion.  

Exploring the investment experience

While the ETF can be bought or sold at any point in time, the 2-year outcome period (i.e., July 18, 2023, to June 30, 2025) is very important as investors will need to hold the fund for the entirety of the outcome period established in order to achieve the expected returns. This is in line with the structure of the FLEX options used in order to achieve the desired outcome of 100% loss protection. So, what is the potential investment experience of the ETF over the 2-year period? The following charts provide a telling illustration. 

Source: Innovator ETFs

Source: Innovator ETFs

As observed from the charts, there isn’t a ‘one-to-one’ correlation between the benchmark and the ETF, hence investors should not expect a return profile that mirrors the S&P 500 Index. Furthermore, when investors buy or sell the fund within the prescribed outcome period, it is evident that their return will vary, as buffer ETFs are built with the endpoint in mind. 

Other noteworthy considerations

For investors that are still intrigued by the solution, there are some additional aspects of the ETF that should be held in consideration, namely: 

The buffer is provided prior to taking into account annual Fund management fees, shareholder transaction fees and any extraordinary expenses incurred by the fund, and that such fees and expenses will have the effect of lowering the buffer. 

The fund’s investments do not provide dividends, as such there is no income provided to investors. 

Most importantly, and worth repeating, there is no guarantee that the fund will be successful in its attempt to provide protection through the buffer. 

While the novelty of TJUL does make it a standout investment solution, investors should be aware of the pros and cons associated with the ETF and determine if its inclusion in their portfolio is appropriate. 

Please note this article is for information purposes only and does not in any way constitute investment advice. It is essential that you seek advice from a registered financial professional prior to making any investment decision.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF U
Become a better investor with NYSE: The Home of ETFs
Visit the ETF U homepage
ETF Guides
Advertisement

Recent educational content

The ETF Show - US-Iran Conflict Sends Oil ETFs Soaring

Asset TV

The ETF Show - US-Iran Conflict Sends Oil ETFs Soaring

Lance McGray, Managing Director and Head of ETF Product at Advisors Asset Management joins The ETF Show.

Asset TV
By Asset TV · March 6, 2026
What's the Fund | Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (Ticker: TSCV)

What’sTheFund

What's the Fund | Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (Ticker: TSCV)

Kyle Detullio, ETF Capital Markets Specialist at Thrivent Asset Management, joins Ethan Hertzfeld on the NYSE trading floor to discuss the Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV).

NYSE logo
By NYSE · March 6, 2026
What's the Fund | Thrivent Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (Ticker: TSME)

What’sTheFund

What's the Fund | Thrivent Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (Ticker: TSME)

Kyle Detullio, ETF Capital Markets Specialist at Thrivent Asset Management, joins Ethan Hertzfeld on the NYSE trading floor to discuss the Thrivent Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (TSME).

NYSE logo
By NYSE · March 6, 2026
What's the Fund | Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (Ticker: TMVE)

What’sTheFund

What's the Fund | Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (Ticker: TMVE)

Kyle Detullio, ETF Capital Markets Specialist at Thrivent Asset Management, joins Ethan Hertzfeld on the NYSE trading floor to discuss the Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE).

NYSE logo
By NYSE · March 6, 2026

Browse all educational columns

Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up