Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
Economic growth must balance natural resource constraints and environmental impact, highlighting the need for policy-driven solutions.


The global economy faces a pivotal challenge: how to grow while managing dwindling natural resources. In a recent episode of Upside & Impact: Investing for Change, Elysabeth Alfano, CEO of VegTech™ Invest hosted Paul Gruenwald, Global Chief Economist of S&P Global, to discuss this pressing issue. Gruenwald’s insights reveal that aligning economic growth with environmental preservation is not only possible but essential.
Indeed, Gruenwald shares in the interview that economic growth is constrained by the state natural resources and that dwindling natural resources could mean dwindling economic growth.
Stay in the loop — get the latest ETF insights: trends, analysis, and expert picks.
A central theme of the conversation was the concept of negative externalities—costs imposed on society, the taxpayer, by private enterprises without being reflected in the price of goods or services. Pollution, a textbook example, underscores the inefficiencies in free markets when companies externalize costs, such as environmental damage, to the government and then ultimately the taxpayer.
Introducing mechanisms like pollution taxes brings societal and corporate costs into balance, ensuring that economic growth does not come at the expense of public welfare. Gruenwald emphasized, “The tax equilibrates the social cost with the private cost.”
This framework challenges traditional assumptions that markets function perfectly when left unregulated. Instead, Gruenwald advocates for policy interventions to internalize costs, fostering markets that reflect true value while mitigating harm to natural capital, since economies can’t grow beyond the capacity of their natural resources.
Further, Gruenwald and Alfano underscore that externalizing costs to society render the markets inefficient because the actual information about the costs of goods sold isn’t fully communicated in the product price. This therefore allows detrimental production practices, sometimes extremely costly to society, such as mass deforestation or disproportionate uses of water as is the case with industrialize animal factories, to go unchecked and an imbalance is created. This isn’t good for markets or society.
We are feeling this societal imbalance now in the shape of Climate Change and environmental degradation due, in part, to the extractive practices of certain industries.
Gruenwald explains this further in a clip from the interview here:
Requiring that companies internalize their costs can result in less destructive production and could reshape how investors view growth opportunities. By pricing in externalities, and shifting the cost of water and land usage, emissions production, water and air pollution, and healthcare costs, among others, to the producers, the businesses are incentivized to prioritize innovation and resource efficiency to reduce their costs. This results in better run companies with better returns, in addition to less destructive tactics. Of course, better returns is what investors desire.
However, this transition to internalize costs requires broad adoption of policies that align corporate and public interests, and that can be tricky. Still, investors increasingly recognize that unsustainable practices present risks, from regulatory penalties to resource scarcity, that aren’t good for portfolios.
Gruenwald’s insights reinforce the timeliness of the VegTech™ Invest investment strategy: investing in companies that prioritize sustainable practices is not only good stewardship but financially prudent. By investing in businesses that reduce dependency on finite resources, Alfano noted that VegTech™ Invest aims to deliver returns that benefit both portfolios and the planet. A few examples of emerging growth sectors that exemplify this alignment, intending to drive returns while preserving ecological systems, are diversified proteins, electric vehicles, and biotechnology.
Economic growth does not have to conflict with environmental preservation. Integrating societal costs into corporate decision-making creates a fairer and more efficient marketplace. This paradigm shift is crucial for a thriving economy, especially as natural resources, and thus society at large, face increasing strain.
By supporting innovation and advocating for policies that balance economic and environmental interests, Gruenwald and Alfano discussed that investors can unlock growth opportunities that endure for generations.
Elysabeth Alfano is the CEO of VegTech™ Invest, Advisor to a food innovation ETF. She is a consultant to C-Suite of multinational companies and speaks internationally on the intersection of investing, sustainability, and food systems transformation. Elysabeth is also the host of the podcast, Upside & Impact: Investing for Change. This article was co-written by the Fractional Associate Director of Comms & Research at VegTech™ Invest, Gwendolyn Brown.
Please note this article is for information purposes only and does not in any way constitute investment advice. It is essential that you seek advice from a registered financial professional prior to making any investment decision.
Latest ETF News
See all ETF newsRent or Build? The Capital Markets Decision Every New ETF Issuer Must Make


Winners & Losers Of 4Q’25 REIT Earnings Season


When ETF Liquidity Is Only an Illusion


ETF Spreads: The Signal Investors Misread


Can ETFs Make Capital Gains Disappear Forever?


Advantages of ETFs over Mutual Funds1/6
Lower Costs
In this guide, we'll explore the advantages of ETFs over mutual funds, giving you valuable insights into why ETFs have gained significant popularity among investors like yourself.
Leveraged ETFs: Unlocking the Potential for Amplified Returns1/6
Understanding Leveraged ETFs
Explore leveraged ETFs: potential for amplified returns & risks. 5 ETFs to consider across equities, commodities & fixed income.
What is a Leveraged ETF?1/6
Introducing Leveraged and Inverse ETFs
In this guide, we'll dive into the world of leveraged ETFs, exploring their definition, mechanics, potential risks, and rewards.
Asset TV
The ETF Show - Rethinking the 60/40 with Alternatives, Thematics
Christian Magoon, Founder and CEO of Amplify ETFs joins The ETF Show to discuss how alternative strategies and thematics are replacing bonds in the 60/40 portfolio.

ETF Trends
ETF Industry KPIs March 16, 2026
The ETF industry saw 22 new launches and 1 closure last week.

Asset TV
The ETF Show - Markets Remain Resilient Despite US-Iran War
Simeon Hyman, Global Investment Strategist at ProShares joins The ETF Show to discuss the market reaction to the US-Iran war, the market rotation, and the need for quality in investor portfolios.

Asset TV
The ETF Show - US-Iran Conflict Sends Oil ETFs Soaring
Lance McGray, Managing Director and Head of ETF Product at Advisors Asset Management joins The ETF Show.

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
