Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ZECPvsQUSETF Comparison
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. ZECP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, QUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. ZECP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.66%, versus 0.15% for QUS. ZECP is down -1.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. QUS performs better with -0.13% YTD performance, and -$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ZECP and QUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ZECP vs QUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZECP QUS | -3.77%-2.69% | -2.22%-0.31% | -1.58%-0.13% | +17.87%+15.64% | +55.99%+66.81% | n/a+69.83% |
| Flows | ZECP QUS | +$4M-$30M | +$16M-$23M | +$10M-$20M | +$50M-$83M | +$210M+$28M | -+$63M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ZECP QUS | +10.10%+8.90% | +15.05%+14.33% | +12.23%+11.91% | n/a+14.40% |
| Max drawdown | ZECP QUS | -5.02%-3.81% | -10.86%-10.91% | -15.48%-13.88% | n/a-22.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | ZECP QUS | 16d12d | 46d46d | 208d128d | n/a701d |
ZECP | QUS | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.49 | $175.23 |
| Previous close 03/13/2026 | $34.22 | $173.86 |
| Consolidated volume 03/13/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ZECP | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ZECP | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.49 | $175.23 |
| 1D performance | +0.80% | +0.79% |
| AuM | $294.43 M | $1.51 B |
| E/R | 0.66% | 0.15% |
ZECP | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Zacks ETFs | SPDR |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 60 | 511 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 24, 2021 | April 15, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ZECP and QUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, ZECP is down -1.58% year-to-date (YTD), while QUS has lost -0.13%. That puts QUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ZECP or QUS?
Year-to-date, the ZECP ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to -$20M for QUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: ZECP or QUS?
Over the past year, ZECP had a volatility of 15.05%, while QUS experienced 14.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: ZECP or QUS?
As of March 13, 2026, ZECP holds $294.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while QUS manages $1.51 B.
What sectors do the ZECP and QUS ETFs invest in?
ZECP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, QUS focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the ZECP ETF and QUS ETF?
ZECP top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QUS holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and META PLATFORMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZECP or QUS?
ZECP holds 61 securities with 47.64% of its assets in the top 15. QUS has 542 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.04%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
