Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ZAPvsUTESETF Comparison
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) belongs to the Infrastructure segment. Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) is part of the US Utilities segment. ZAP's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, UTES's top sector exposures are Utilities, ZAP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.49% for UTES. ZAP is up 11.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$78M in YTD flows. UTES performs worse with 4.03% YTD performance, and -$68M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ZAP and UTES below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ZAP vs UTES performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZAP UTES | +1.79%+3.92% | +9.92%+4.23% | +11.59%+4.03% | +37.11%+35.29% | n/a+98.58% | n/a+128.65% |
| Flows | ZAP UTES | +$33M+$25M | +$90M-$37M | +$78M-$68M | +$253M+$893M | -+$1.23B | -+$1.23B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ZAP UTES | +14.39%+23.55% | +15.93%+22.19% | n/a+21.02% | n/a+20.11% |
| Max drawdown | ZAP UTES | -3.08%-8.65% | -8.69%-13.76% | n/a-17.24% | n/a-20.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | ZAP UTES | 14d28d | 26d146d | n/a109d | n/a590d |
ZAP | UTES | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.41 | $80.43 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $32.57 | $82.12 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ZAP | UTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ZAP | UTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.41 | $80.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.51% | -2.06% |
| AuM | $356.80 M | $1.41 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.49% |
ZAP | UTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | VIRTUS Investment Partners |
| Benchmark | Global X U.S. Electrification Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 18 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2024 | February 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ZAP and UTES ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ZAP is up 11.59% year-to-date (YTD), while UTES has returned 4.03%. That puts ZAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ZAP or UTES?
Year-to-date, the ZAP ETF saw +$78M in flows, compared to -$68M for UTES.
Which ETF is more volatile: ZAP or UTES?
Over the past year, ZAP had a volatility of 15.93%, while UTES experienced 22.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: ZAP or UTES?
As of March 11, 2026, ZAP holds $356.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while UTES manages $1.41 B.
What sectors do the ZAP and UTES ETFs invest in?
ZAP leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, UTES focuses on Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the ZAP ETF and UTES ETF?
ZAP top holdings include AMETEK, QUANTA SERVICES and US6362744095. UTES holds in its top three: US87422Q1094, VISTRA CORP and CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZAP or UTES?
ZAP holds 50 securities with 60.14% of its assets in the top 15. UTES has 18 securities and a top 15 weight of 94.89%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
