Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ZAPvsPOWRETF Comparison
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and iShares US Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. ZAP's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, POWR's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. ZAP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.4% for POWR. ZAP is up 11.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$78M in YTD flows. POWR performs worse with 11.24% YTD performance, and +$44M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ZAP and POWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ZAP vs POWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZAP POWR | +1.79%+1.47% | +9.92%+7.61% | +11.59%+11.24% | +37.11%+20.98% | n/a+33.31% | n/a+97.70% |
| Flows | ZAP POWR | +$33M+$30M | +$90M+$46M | +$78M+$44M | +$253M+$33M | -+$1M | -+$9M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ZAP POWR | +14.39%+16.05% | +15.93%+21.12% | n/a+18.97% | n/a+22.87% |
| Max drawdown | ZAP POWR | -3.08%-4.42% | -8.69%-17.56% | n/a-22.61% | n/a-24.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | ZAP POWR | 14d40d | 26d76d | n/a663d | n/a160d |
ZAP | POWR | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.41 | $26.18 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $32.57 | $26.13 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ZAP | POWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ZAP | POWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.41 | $26.18 |
| 1D performance | -0.51% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $356.80 M | $126.69 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.4% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ZAP and POWR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ZAP is up 11.59% year-to-date (YTD), while POWR has returned 11.24%. That puts ZAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ZAP or POWR?
Year-to-date, the ZAP ETF saw +$78M in flows, compared to +$44M for POWR.
Which ETF is more volatile: ZAP or POWR?
Over the past year, ZAP had a volatility of 15.93%, while POWR experienced 21.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: ZAP or POWR?
As of March 11, 2026, ZAP holds $356.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while POWR manages $126.69 M.
What sectors do the ZAP and POWR ETFs invest in?
ZAP leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, POWR focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the ZAP ETF and POWR ETF?
ZAP top holdings include AMETEK, QUANTA SERVICES and US6362744095. POWR holds in its top three: NEXTERA ENERGY, QUANTA SERVICES and EATON CORP PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZAP or POWR?
ZAP holds 50 securities with 60.14% of its assets in the top 15. POWR has 69 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.43%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
