Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ZAPvsFPWRETF Comparison
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) belongs to the Infrastructure segment. First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) is part of the segment. ZAP's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FPWR's top sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. ZAP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.96% for FPWR. ZAP is up 11.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$78M in YTD flows. FPWR performs better with 12.9% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ZAP and FPWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ZAP vs FPWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZAP FPWR | +1.79%+3.00% | +9.92%+12.26% | +11.59%+12.90% | +37.11%+27.43% | n/a+63.38% | n/a+83.90% |
| Flows | ZAP FPWR | +$33M- | +$90M+$2M | +$78M+$2M | +$253M+$3M | --$19M | -+$6M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ZAP FPWR | +14.39%+10.71% | +15.93%+12.84% | n/a+13.32% | n/a+14.40% |
| Max drawdown | ZAP FPWR | -3.08%-1.86% | -8.69%-8.42% | n/a-14.68% | n/a-18.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | ZAP FPWR | 14d8d | 26d34d | n/a288d | n/a694d |
ZAP | FPWR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.42 | $37.38 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $32.41 | $37.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ZAP | FPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ZAP | FPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.42 | $37.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | +0.36% |
| AuM | $356.80 M | $22.30 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.96% |
ZAP | FPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Global X U.S. Electrification Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 58 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2024 | August 19, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ZAP and FPWR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ZAP is up 11.59% year-to-date (YTD), while FPWR has returned 12.9%. That puts FPWR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ZAP or FPWR?
Year-to-date, the ZAP ETF saw +$78M in flows, compared to +$2M for FPWR.
Which ETF is more volatile: ZAP or FPWR?
Over the past year, ZAP had a volatility of 15.93%, while FPWR experienced 12.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: ZAP or FPWR?
As of March 11, 2026, ZAP holds $356.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while FPWR manages $22.30 M.
What sectors do the ZAP and FPWR ETFs invest in?
ZAP leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, FPWR focuses on Utilities, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ZAP ETF and FPWR ETF?
ZAP top holdings include AMETEK, QUANTA SERVICES and US6362744095. FPWR holds in its top three: DUKE ENERGY, SOUTHERN and NFG.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZAP or FPWR?
ZAP holds 50 securities with 60.14% of its assets in the top 15. FPWR has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.45%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.