New

Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

YBTYvsBUFQETF Comparison

ETF 1
YBTY

GraniteShares YieldBoost TopYielders ETF

This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.09%
VS
ETF 2
BUFQ

FT Vest Fund of Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETFs

This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.09%

GraniteShares YieldBoost TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and FT Vest Fund of Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETFs (BUFQ) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. YBTY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 1% for BUFQ. YBTY is down -25.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. BUFQ performs better with 10.89% YTD performance, and +$327M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of YBTY and BUFQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

YBTY vs BUFQ performance and flow charts

Performance

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Jul 28Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25

Cumulative Flows

0 M10 M20 M30 M40 M50 MJul 28Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/28/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
YBTY
BUFQ
-0.88%+3.04%
-10.77%+1.20%
-25.38%+10.89%
n/a+17.06%
n/a+55.59%
n/an/a
Flows
YBTY
BUFQ
-+$51M
-$462K+$119M
+$1M+$327M
-+$373M
-+$1.07B
--
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
YBTY
BUFQ
+12.13%+9.60%
n/a+8.75%
n/a+11.35%
n/an/a
Max drawdown
YBTY
BUFQ
-11.62%-4.09%
n/a-5.34%
n/a-15.97%
n/an/a
Max drawdown duration
YBTY
BUFQ
89d49d
n/a70d
n/a110d
n/an/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
YBTY
BUFQ
Last sale
9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
$10.51
$39.53
Previous close
08/31/2026
$10.58
$39.75
Consolidated volume
08/31/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
YBTY
BUFQ
Last price
$10.51
$39.53
1D performance
-0.71%
-0.55%
AuM$1.71 M$1.61 B
E/R1.38%1%
Characteristics
YBTY
BUFQ
Management strategyActiveActive
ProviderGraniteSharesFirst Trust
Benchmark--
N° of holdings11
Asset class--
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 16, 2025June 15, 2022
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

YBTY
Other
100%
BUFQ
Other
100%

Sectors

YBTY
Other
100%
BUFQ
Other
100%
Advertisement

Diversification

YBTY

Total weight of top 8 holdings out of 8

95.98%
BUFQ

Total weight of top 4 holdings out of 4

99.95%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
YBTY
US38747T5671
13.26%
US38747R2563
12.50%
US38747R2647
12.19%
US38747R1730
11.90%
US38747T6901
11.62%
US38747R1573
11.57%
US38747R1656
11.54%
US38747R2316
11.40%
BUFQ
US33740U8365
25.14%
US33740F5816
25.04%
US33740F6491
25.00%
US33740F5576
24.77%
Frequently asked questions about YBTY and BUFQ

How have the YBTY and BUFQ ETFs performed in 2026?

As of August 28, 2026, YBTY is down -25.38% year-to-date (YTD), while BUFQ has returned 10.89%. That puts BUFQ better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: YBTY or BUFQ?

Year-to-date, the YBTY ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$327M for BUFQ.

Which ETF is bigger: YBTY or BUFQ?

As of August 28, 2026, YBTY holds $1.71 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUFQ manages $1.61 B.

What are the top holdings of the YBTY ETF and BUFQ ETF?

YBTY top holdings include US38747T5671, US38747R2563 and US38747R2647. BUFQ holds in its top three: US33740U8365, US33740F5816 and US33740F6491.

Which ETF is more diversified: YBTY or BUFQ?

YBTY has 8 securities and BUFQ has 4 securities.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF Comparison Tool

Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?

Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.