XYLGvsBUFRETF Comparison
VS
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and FT Vest Fund of Buffer ETF (BUFR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. XYLG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.95% for BUFR. XYLG is up 12.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. BUFR performs worse with 10.29% YTD performance, and +$1.67B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XYLG and BUFR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XYLG vs BUFR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XYLG BUFR | +0.62%+0.69% | +4.28%+3.53% | +12.68%+10.29% | +14.64%+11.65% | +72.87%+59.35% | +61.68%+60.65% |
| Flows | XYLG BUFR | +$4M+$181M | +$7M+$557M | +$6M+$1.67B | +$18M+$2.09B | +$5M+$6.26B | +$39M+$7.94B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XYLG BUFR | +8.12%+5.68% | +9.65%+6.54% | +12.20%+8.89% | +13.97%+10.67% |
| Max drawdown | XYLG BUFR | -1.75%-1.14% | -6.95%-4.57% | -17.16%-12.72% | -21.24%-13.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | XYLG BUFR | 15d15d | 48d42d | 154d124d | 736d513d |
Trading data
XYLG | BUFR | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.77 | $37.87 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $29.67 | $37.78 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BUFR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexXYLG | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XYLG | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.77 | $37.87 |
| 1D performance | +0.34% | +0.24% |
| AuM | $73.75 M | $10.99 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.95% |
Characteristics
XYLG | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | First Trust |
| Benchmark | CBOE S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 21, 2013 | August 10, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XYLG
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Sectors
XYLG
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
XYLG
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
XYLG
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about XYLG and BUFR
How have the XYLG and BUFR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, XYLG is up 12.68% year-to-date (YTD), while BUFR has returned 10.29%. That puts XYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XYLG or BUFR?
Year-to-date, the XYLG ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$1.67B for BUFR.
Which ETF is more volatile: XYLG or BUFR?
Over the past year, XYLG had a volatility of 9.65%, while BUFR experienced 6.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: XYLG or BUFR?
As of October 27, 2026, XYLG holds $73.75 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUFR manages $10.99 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
