Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XVVvsGSUSETF Comparison
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. XVV's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, GSUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. XVV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.09% for GSUS. XVV is down -4.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$61M in YTD flows. GSUS performs better with -1.15% YTD performance, and -$75M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XVV and GSUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XVV vs GSUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XVV GSUS | -3.09%-2.15% | -3.99%-1.93% | -4.48%-1.15% | +20.22%+23.24% | +80.11%+84.71% | +76.46%+81.58% |
| Flows | XVV GSUS | -$50M-$75M | +$169M-$85M | +$61M-$75M | +$270M-$59M | +$354M+$1.03B | +$498M+$1.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XVV GSUS | +12.87%+11.62% | +18.99%+18.33% | +15.55%+14.95% | +17.64%+17.35% |
| Max drawdown | XVV GSUS | -6.12%-3.51% | -14.04%-13.91% | -19.53%-19.14% | -27.18%-25.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | XVV GSUS | 60d58d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 709d715d |
XVV | GSUS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.33 | $91.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $50.65 | $91.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XVV | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XVV | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.33 | $91.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.63% | -0.62% |
| AuM | $628.66 M | $2.87 B |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.09% |
XVV | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Sustainability Screened Index | Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 421 | 400 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2020 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XVV and GSUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XVV is down -4.48% year-to-date (YTD), while GSUS has lost -1.15%. That puts GSUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XVV or GSUS?
Year-to-date, the XVV ETF saw +$61M in flows, compared to -$75M for GSUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: XVV or GSUS?
Over the past year, XVV had a volatility of 18.99%, while GSUS experienced 18.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: XVV or GSUS?
As of March 13, 2026, XVV holds $628.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSUS manages $2.87 B.
What sectors do the XVV and GSUS ETFs invest in?
XVV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, GSUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the XVV ETF and GSUS ETF?
XVV top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GSUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: XVV or GSUS?
XVV holds 441 securities with 48.36% of its assets in the top 15. GSUS has 419 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.2%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
