Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XSMOvsRZGETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) is part of the US Small Cap Growth segment. XSMO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, RZG's top sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. XSMO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.36%, versus 0.35% for RZG. XSMO is up 4.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$120M in YTD flows. RZG performs worse with 2.41% YTD performance, and -$35K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XSMO and RZG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XSMO vs RZG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSMO RZG | -5.86%-5.72% | +0.74%-0.25% | +4.24%+2.41% | +26.25%+24.17% | +72.24%+50.88% | +43.19%+5.56% |
| Flows | XSMO RZG | +$54M- | +$142M+$524K | +$120M-$35K | +$537M-$14M | +$1.79B-$18M | +$1.83B-$39M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XSMO RZG | +17.21%+17.51% | +22.05%+22.33% | +20.83%+20.33% | +23.21%+22.97% |
| Max drawdown | XSMO RZG | -7.17%-7.05% | -13.40%-14.71% | -24.70%-25.62% | -29.80%-38.45% |
| Max drawdown duration | XSMO RZG | 32d15d | 35d46d | 282d296d | 862d1521d |
XSMO | RZG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.00 | $55.63 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $75.14 | $55.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XSMO | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XSMO | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.00 | $55.63 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $2.26 B | $105.77 M |
| E/R | 0.36% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XSMO and RZG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XSMO is up 4.24% year-to-date (YTD), while RZG has returned 2.41%. That puts XSMO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XSMO or RZG?
Year-to-date, the XSMO ETF saw +$120M in flows, compared to -$35K for RZG.
Which ETF is more volatile: XSMO or RZG?
Over the past year, XSMO had a volatility of 22.05%, while RZG experienced 22.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: XSMO or RZG?
As of March 13, 2026, XSMO holds $2.26 B in assets under management (AUM), while RZG manages $105.77 M.
What sectors do the XSMO and RZG ETFs invest in?
XSMO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, RZG focuses on Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the XSMO ETF and RZG ETF?
XSMO top holdings include TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INTERDIGITAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES. RZG holds in its top three: ACM RESEARCH, PTC THERAPEUTI/D and TRANSMEDICS GROUP.
Which ETF is more diversified: XSMO or RZG?
XSMO holds 111 securities with 34.64% of its assets in the top 15. RZG has 130 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.07%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
