Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XSHQvsXSMOETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XSHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, XSMO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. XSHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.36% for XSMO. XSHQ is down -0.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. XSMO performs better with 4.24% YTD performance, and +$120M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XSHQ and XSMO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XSHQ vs XSMO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSHQ XSMO | -6.95%-5.86% | -3.61%+0.74% | -0.98%+4.24% | +12.23%+26.25% | +31.80%+72.24% | +16.00%+43.19% |
| Flows | XSHQ XSMO | -$5M+$54M | -$16M+$142M | -$13M+$120M | -$218M+$537M | +$204M+$1.79B | +$196M+$1.83B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XSHQ XSMO | +16.24%+17.21% | +21.73%+22.05% | +20.21%+20.83% | +21.19%+23.21% |
| Max drawdown | XSHQ XSMO | -8.19%-7.17% | -13.47%-13.40% | -27.13%-24.70% | -27.13%-29.80% |
| Max drawdown duration | XSHQ XSMO | 32d32d | 37d35d | 473d282d | 473d862d |
XSHQ | XSMO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.74 | $75.00 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.63 | $75.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XSHQ | XSMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XSHQ | XSMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.74 | $75.00 |
| 1D performance | +0.26% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $231.83 M | $2.26 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.36% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XSHQ and XSMO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XSHQ is down -0.98% year-to-date (YTD), while XSMO has returned 4.24%. That puts XSMO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XSHQ or XSMO?
Year-to-date, the XSHQ ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to +$120M for XSMO.
Which ETF is more volatile: XSHQ or XSMO?
Over the past year, XSHQ had a volatility of 21.73%, while XSMO experienced 22.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: XSHQ or XSMO?
As of March 13, 2026, XSHQ holds $231.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while XSMO manages $2.26 B.
What sectors do the XSHQ and XSMO ETFs invest in?
XSHQ leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, XSMO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the XSHQ ETF and XSMO ETF?
XSHQ top holdings include INTERDIGITAL, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES. XSMO holds in its top three: TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INTERDIGITAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: XSHQ or XSMO?
XSHQ holds 120 securities with 29.93% of its assets in the top 15. XSMO has 111 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.64%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
