Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XSHQvsSCOWETF Comparison
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XSHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, SCOW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. XSHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.59% for SCOW. XSHQ is down -1.27% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. SCOW performs worse with -2.15% YTD performance, and +$512K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XSHQ and SCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XSHQ vs SCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSHQ SCOW | -6.09%-3.27% | -4.18%-6.42% | -1.27%-2.15% | +10.01%n/a | +31.41%n/a | +15.25%n/a |
| Flows | XSHQ SCOW | -$5M- | -$16M+$512K | -$13M+$512K | -$216M- | +$204M- | +$196M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XSHQ SCOW | +16.23%+18.45% | +21.80%n/a | +20.23%n/a | +21.19%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XSHQ SCOW | -8.19%-6.87% | -13.47%n/a | -27.13%n/a | -27.13%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XSHQ SCOW | 31d80d | 37dn/a | 472dn/a | 472dn/a |
XSHQ | SCOW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.74 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.63 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XSHQ | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XSHQ | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.74 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.26% | – |
| AuM | $231.15 M | $1.44 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.59% |
XSHQ | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 118 | 74 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 6, 2017 | August 27, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XSHQ and SCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, XSHQ is down -1.27% year-to-date (YTD), while SCOW has lost -2.15%. That puts XSHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XSHQ or SCOW?
Year-to-date, the XSHQ ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to +$512K for SCOW.
Which ETF is bigger: XSHQ or SCOW?
As of March 12, 2026, XSHQ holds $231.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCOW manages $1.44 M.
What sectors do the XSHQ and SCOW ETFs invest in?
XSHQ leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCOW focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the XSHQ ETF and SCOW ETF?
XSHQ top holdings include INTERDIGITAL, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES. SCOW holds in its top three: JACKSON FINANCIAL INC, MARKETAXESS and INTERDIGITAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: XSHQ or SCOW?
XSHQ holds 120 securities with 29.93% of its assets in the top 15. SCOW has 75 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
