Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XSHQvsPSCETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF (PSC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XSHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, PSC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. XSHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.38% for PSC. XSHQ is down -1.27% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. PSC performs better with 0.85% YTD performance, and +$266M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XSHQ and PSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XSHQ vs PSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSHQ PSC | -6.09%-4.26% | -4.18%-2.07% | -1.27%+0.85% | +10.01%+21.92% | +31.41%+52.91% | +15.25%+34.13% |
| Flows | XSHQ PSC | -$5M+$103M | -$16M+$312M | -$13M+$266M | -$216M+$944M | +$204M+$1.39B | +$196M+$492M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XSHQ PSC | +16.23%+16.87% | +21.80%+21.59% | +20.23%+19.67% | +21.19%+20.89% |
| Max drawdown | XSHQ PSC | -8.19%-6.32% | -13.47%-13.88% | -27.13%-23.69% | -27.13%-25.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | XSHQ PSC | 31d48d | 37d45d | 472d284d | 472d844d |
XSHQ | PSC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.77 | $56.86 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.63 | $56.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XSHQ | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XSHQ | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.77 | $56.86 |
| 1D performance | +0.34% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $231.15 M | $1.80 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.38% |
XSHQ | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Principal Global Investors |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 118 | 439 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 6, 2017 | September 21, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XSHQ and PSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, XSHQ is down -1.27% year-to-date (YTD), while PSC has returned 0.85%. That puts PSC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XSHQ or PSC?
Year-to-date, the XSHQ ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to +$266M for PSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: XSHQ or PSC?
Over the past year, XSHQ had a volatility of 21.8%, while PSC experienced 21.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: XSHQ or PSC?
As of March 12, 2026, XSHQ holds $231.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while PSC manages $1.80 B.
What sectors do the XSHQ and PSC ETFs invest in?
XSHQ leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, PSC focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XSHQ ETF and PSC ETF?
XSHQ top holdings include INTERDIGITAL, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES. PSC holds in its top three: COEUR MINING INC, TTM TECHNOLOGIES and GUARDANT HEALTH INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: XSHQ or PSC?
XSHQ holds 120 securities with 29.93% of its assets in the top 15. PSC has 444 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.42%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
