Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XSHQvsGRPZETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) is part of the US Small Cap segment. XSHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, GRPZ's top sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. XSHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.35% for GRPZ. XSHQ is down -1.27% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. GRPZ performs better with 0.96% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XSHQ and GRPZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XSHQ vs GRPZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSHQ GRPZ | -6.09%-6.81% | -4.18%-3.71% | -1.27%+0.96% | +10.01%+17.31% | +31.41%n/a | +15.25%n/a |
| Flows | XSHQ GRPZ | -$5M- | -$16M-$1K | -$13M- | -$216M-$5K | +$204M- | +$196M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XSHQ GRPZ | +16.23%+16.58% | +21.80%+22.39% | +20.23%n/a | +21.19%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XSHQ GRPZ | -8.19%-8.72% | -13.47%-14.71% | -27.13%n/a | -27.13%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XSHQ GRPZ | 31d32d | 37d46d | 472dn/a | 472dn/a |
XSHQ | GRPZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.77 | $26.80 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.63 | $27.28 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XSHQ | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XSHQ | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.77 | $26.80 |
| 1D performance | +0.34% | -1.74% |
| AuM | $231.15 M | $2.68 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XSHQ and GRPZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, XSHQ is down -1.27% year-to-date (YTD), while GRPZ has returned 0.96%. That puts GRPZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XSHQ or GRPZ?
Year-to-date, the XSHQ ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to - for GRPZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: XSHQ or GRPZ?
Over the past year, XSHQ had a volatility of 21.8%, while GRPZ experienced 22.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: XSHQ or GRPZ?
As of March 12, 2026, XSHQ holds $231.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while GRPZ manages $2.68 M.
What sectors do the XSHQ and GRPZ ETFs invest in?
XSHQ leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, GRPZ focuses on Financials, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the XSHQ ETF and GRPZ ETF?
XSHQ top holdings include INTERDIGITAL, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES. GRPZ holds in its top three: INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC and POWELL INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: XSHQ or GRPZ?
XSHQ holds 120 securities with 29.93% of its assets in the top 15. GRPZ has 90 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.48%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
