XQQIvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. XQQI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XQQI and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XQQI vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XQQI GPIQ | +19.36%+11.04% | n/a+5.68% | n/a+7.86% | n/a+38.87% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | XQQI GPIQ | +$32M+$296M | -+$705M | -+$981M | -+$2.80B | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XQQI GPIQ | n/a+17.79% | n/a+13.85% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | XQQI GPIQ | n/a-9.57% | n/a-9.57% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XQQI GPIQ | n/a75d | n/a75d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
XQQI | GPIQ | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.46 | $54.61 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $49.64 | $55.05 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
XQQI | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.46 | $54.61 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.80% |
| AuM | $81.24 M | $3.71 B |
| E/R | 0.98% | 0.35% |
XQQI | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 2, 2026 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
