Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMVMvsRFVETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. XMVM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Utilities. In contrast, RFV's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. XMVM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.41%, versus 0.35% for RFV. XMVM is up 0.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$57M in YTD flows. RFV performs worse with -1.23% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMVM and RFV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMVM vs RFV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMVM RFV | -7.05%-9.02% | -1.66%-3.71% | +0.26%-1.23% | +27.58%+15.61% | +59.66%+45.54% | +56.51%+48.79% |
| Flows | XMVM RFV | +$36M-$7M | +$65M-$4M | +$57M-$5M | +$105M+$14M | +$121M-$84M | +$246M+$102M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMVM RFV | +14.77%+18.61% | +20.97%+24.31% | +19.32%+21.18% | +21.85%+22.20% |
| Max drawdown | XMVM RFV | -7.96%-11.55% | -13.97%-15.77% | -23.80%-24.37% | -23.80%-24.37% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMVM RFV | 33d33d | 46d43d | 274d226d | 274d226d |
XMVM | RFV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $64.15 | $126.11 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $64.23 | $126.58 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMVM | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMVM | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $64.15 | $126.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.12% | -0.37% |
| AuM | $405.84 M | $286.45 M |
| E/R | 0.41% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMVM and RFV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XMVM is up 0.26% year-to-date (YTD), while RFV has lost -1.23%. That puts XMVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMVM or RFV?
Year-to-date, the XMVM ETF saw +$57M in flows, compared to -$5M for RFV.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMVM or RFV?
Over the past year, XMVM had a volatility of 20.97%, while RFV experienced 24.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMVM or RFV?
As of March 13, 2026, XMVM holds $405.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while RFV manages $286.45 M.
What sectors do the XMVM and RFV ETFs invest in?
XMVM leans toward sectors like Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Utilities. Meanwhile, RFV focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the XMVM ETF and RFV ETF?
XMVM top holdings include LEAR, BRIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL and TD SYNNEX. RFV holds in its top three: CONCENTRIX CORP, AVNET and ARROW ELECTRONICS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMVM or RFV?
XMVM holds 80 securities with 27.38% of its assets in the top 15. RFV has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.66%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
