XMVMvsFABETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FAB) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals. XMVM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.37%, versus 0.66% for FAB. XMVM is up 14.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$110M in YTD flows. FAB performs better with 17.3% YTD performance, and +$25M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMVM and FAB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMVM vs FAB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMVM FAB | -3.09%-3.12% | +5.10%+5.19% | +14.94%+17.30% | +19.59%+20.97% | +64.24%+52.97% | +80.04%+60.79% |
| Flows | XMVM FAB | +$10M-$11M | +$34M+$26M | +$110M+$25M | +$149M+$21M | +$194M-$51M | +$214M-$21M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMVM FAB | +10.29%+10.82% | +13.67%+12.55% | +18.19%+16.68% | +20.94%+18.82% |
| Max drawdown | XMVM FAB | -3.79%-4.14% | -9.19%-6.70% | -23.80%-22.74% | -23.80%-22.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMVM FAB | 33d32d | 80d53d | 274d366d | 274d366d |
Trading data
XMVM | FAB | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.96 | $102.67 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $73.33 | $103.80 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XMVM | FAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XMVM | FAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.96 | $102.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.50% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $514.88 M | $166.04 M |
| E/R | 0.37% | 0.66% |
Characteristics
XMVM | FAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P 400 High Momentum Value Index | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 667 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | May 8, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMVM
USA
97.25%
Other
2.75%
FAB
USA
93.96%
Other
6.04%
Sectors
XMVM
Finance
42.07%
Energy
16.49%
Consumer Cyclical.
10.1%
Industrials
7.78%
Other
23.55%
FAB
Finance
29.47%
Energy
12.99%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.54%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.45%
Utilities
7.31%
Other
33.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
XMVM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.87%
FAB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
XMVM
PBF Energy, Inc.
3.58%
Macy's, Inc.
2.42%
HF Sinclair Corp.
2.19%
AutoNation, Inc.
2.18%
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
2.12%
Lear Corp.
1.93%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.93%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
1.83%
Greif, Inc.
1.82%
First American Financial Corp.
1.74%
Avnet, Inc.
1.67%
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
1.63%
CNX Resources Corp.
1.62%
Bank OZK
1.61%
Old Republic International Corp.
1.61%
FAB
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.
0.67%
Accenture Plc
0.62%
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.61%
ConocoPhillips
0.55%
Global Payments, Inc.
0.54%
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
0.53%
AT&T, Inc.
0.51%
EOG Resources, Inc.
0.50%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.49%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
0.49%
Phillips 66
0.48%
General Mills, Inc.
0.48%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
0.47%
General Motors Co.
0.47%
The Walt Disney Co.
0.47%
Frequently asked questions about XMVM and FAB
How have the XMVM and FAB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, XMVM is up 14.94% year-to-date (YTD), while FAB has returned 17.3%. That puts FAB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMVM or FAB?
Year-to-date, the XMVM ETF saw +$110M in flows, compared to +$25M for FAB.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMVM or FAB?
Over the past year, XMVM had a volatility of 13.67%, while FAB experienced 12.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMVM or FAB?
As of September 18, 2026, XMVM holds $514.88 M in assets under management (AUM), while FAB manages $166.04 M.
What sectors do the XMVM and FAB ETFs invest in?
XMVM leans toward sectors like Finance, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FAB focuses on Finance, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the XMVM ETF and FAB ETF?
XMVM top holdings include PBF Energy, Inc., Macy's, Inc. and HF Sinclair Corp.. FAB holds in its top three: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Accenture Plc and PayPal Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMVM or FAB?
XMVM holds 79 securities with 29.87% of its assets in the top 15. FAB has 667 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.88%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
