XMMOvsSMAPETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMMO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, SMAP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. XMMO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for SMAP. XMMO is up 16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$876M in YTD flows. SMAP performs worse with 5.75% YTD performance, and -$26K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMMO and SMAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMMO vs SMAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMMO SMAP | +8.55%+5.98% | +13.31%+2.32% | +16.00%+5.75% | +39.16%+15.49% | +116.79%n/a | +95.04%n/a |
| Flows | XMMO SMAP | +$401M- | +$816M-$26K | +$876M-$26K | +$1.82B-$26K | +$3.87B- | +$4.10B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMMO SMAP | +24.13%+18.63% | +17.73%+16.31% | +19.89%n/a | +21.13%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XMMO SMAP | -8.30%-9.95% | -8.30%-9.95% | -24.88%n/a | -27.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMMO SMAP | 36d68d | 36d68d | 289dn/a | 812dn/a |
Trading data
XMMO | SMAP | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $160.22 | $26.09 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $159.83 | $26.28 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMAP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexXMMO | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XMMO | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $160.22 | $26.09 |
| 1D performance | +0.24% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $6.84 B | $1.31 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
XMMO | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Midcap 400 Momentum Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 72 | 54 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | October 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMMO
USA
85.82%
Other
14.18%
SMAP
USA
94.92%
Other
5.08%
Sectors
XMMO
Industrials
32.01%
Materials
12.37%
Information Techn.
12.13%
Energy
7.34%
Other
36.15%
SMAP
Industrials
18.99%
Financials
14.65%
Health Care
14.16%
Information Techn.
12.84%
Consumer Discreti.
8.3%
Materials
7.57%
Other
23.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
XMMO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.07%
SMAP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
XMMO
CURTISS WRIGHT
3.92%
TECHNIPFMC PLC
3.69%
ROYAL GOLD
2.88%
WOODWARD
2.72%
CASEYS GENERAL STORES
2.71%
ATI INC
2.59%
FABRINET
2.52%
US65290E1010
2.43%
KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS
2.31%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.25%
HECLA MINING
2.09%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC
2.07%
MICHAEL STORES
1.98%
FLEX LTD
1.97%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD
1.94%
SMAP
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
3.71%
CASEYS GENERAL STORES
3.32%
WEST PHARM SVCS
3.10%
STIFEL FINANCIAL
3.05%
MATADOR RESOURCES
3.01%
MKS INSTRUMENTS
2.87%
CURTISS WRIGHT
2.77%
WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
2.74%
WATSCO
2.64%
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP
2.63%
MARKET CORPORATION
2.54%
RANGE RESOURCES
2.54%
EAGLE MATERIALS
2.38%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
2.28%
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
2.26%
Frequently asked questions about XMMO and SMAP
How have the XMMO and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 1, 2026, XMMO is up 16% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has returned 5.75%. That puts XMMO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMMO or SMAP?
Year-to-date, the XMMO ETF saw +$876M in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMMO or SMAP?
Over the past year, XMMO had a volatility of 17.73%, while SMAP experienced 16.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMMO or SMAP?
As of May 1, 2026, XMMO holds $6.84 B in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.31 M.
What sectors do the XMMO and SMAP ETFs invest in?
XMMO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XMMO ETF and SMAP ETF?
XMMO top holdings include CURTISS WRIGHT, TECHNIPFMC PLC and ROYAL GOLD. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and WEST PHARM SVCS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMMO or SMAP?
XMMO holds 77 securities with 38.07% of its assets in the top 15. SMAP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
