Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMMOvsSMAPETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMMO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, SMAP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. XMMO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for SMAP. XMMO is up 3.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$234M in YTD flows. SMAP performs worse with -2.6% YTD performance, and -$26K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMMO and SMAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMMO vs SMAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMMO SMAP | -2.31%-7.76% | +2.98%-3.92% | +3.27%-2.60% | +29.87%+7.37% | +99.93%n/a | +74.49%n/a |
| Flows | XMMO SMAP | +$106M+$620K | +$322M-$26K | +$234M-$26K | +$1.09B-$26K | +$3.23B- | +$3.43B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMMO SMAP | +16.94%+15.01% | +21.21%+20.80% | +19.41%n/a | +21.00%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XMMO SMAP | -6.02%-8.85% | -13.91%-14.26% | -24.88%n/a | -27.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMMO SMAP | 11d33d | 37d46d | 289dn/a | 812dn/a |
XMMO | SMAP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $142.85 | $24.12 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $143.15 | $24.18 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMMO | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMMO | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $142.85 | $24.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $5.49 B | $1.20 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
XMMO | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Midcap 400 Momentum Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 76 | 56 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | October 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMMO and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XMMO is up 3.27% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has lost -2.6%. That puts XMMO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMMO or SMAP?
Year-to-date, the XMMO ETF saw +$234M in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMMO or SMAP?
Over the past year, XMMO had a volatility of 21.21%, while SMAP experienced 20.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMMO or SMAP?
As of March 13, 2026, XMMO holds $5.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.20 M.
What sectors do the XMMO and SMAP ETFs invest in?
XMMO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XMMO ETF and SMAP ETF?
XMMO top holdings include CIENA, CURTISS WRIGHT and TWILIO. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CURTISS WRIGHT and STIFEL FINANCIAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMMO or SMAP?
XMMO holds 78 securities with 44.5% of its assets in the top 15. SMAP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.75%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
