XMMOvsPAMCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMMO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, PAMC's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. XMMO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for PAMC. XMMO is up 15.5% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.52B in YTD flows. PAMC performs better with 18.46% YTD performance, and -$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMMO and PAMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMMO vs PAMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMMO PAMC | -3.32%+0.60% | -2.00%+3.95% | +15.50%+18.46% | +23.80%+27.03% | +96.45%+58.18% | +90.87%+61.35% |
| Flows | XMMO PAMC | -$56M+$78K | +$639M-$11M | +$1.52B-$11M | +$2.15B-$20M | +$4.53B-$3M | +$4.78B-$3M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMMO PAMC | +28.21%+17.99% | +21.51%+18.94% | +21.21%+18.60% | +21.68%+20.37% |
| Max drawdown | XMMO PAMC | -13.96%-4.82% | -13.96%-10.32% | -24.88%-25.78% | -27.83%-26.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMMO PAMC | 44d16d | 44d89d | 289d422d | 812d801d |
Trading data
XMMO | PAMC | |
Last sale 8/6/2026 at 5:08 PM | $160.57 | $55.11 |
| Previous close 08/05/2026 | $159.24 | $55.10 |
| Consolidated volume 08/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XMMO | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 5:08 PM
Live
Closed
XMMO | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $160.57 | $55.11 |
| 1D performance | +0.83% | +0.03% |
| AuM | $7.41 B | $55.02 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
XMMO | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Midcap 400 Momentum Index | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 75 | 151 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | June 24, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMMO
USA
92.32%
Other
7.68%
PAMC
USA
93.62%
Other
6.38%
Sectors
XMMO
Industrials
31.22%
Non-Energy Materi.
17.39%
Technology
13.42%
Finance
8.63%
Energy
7.76%
Healthcare
7.01%
Other
14.56%
PAMC
Finance
25.1%
Industrials
20.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.49%
Technology
10.9%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.26%
Energy
7.78%
Other
14.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
XMMO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.74%
PAMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
XMMO
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
4.05%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.36%
ATI, Inc.
3.33%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
3.15%
Woodward, Inc.
3.06%
TechnipFMC plc
3.06%
nVent Electric Plc
2.64%
MKS, Inc.
2.62%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.40%
Royal Gold, Inc.
2.31%
Roivant Sciences Ltd.
2.28%
MasTec, Inc.
2.27%
Fabrinet
2.19%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
2.02%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
2.00%
PAMC
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.16%
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
2.08%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.79%
ATI, Inc.
1.78%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
1.68%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
1.66%
Woodward, Inc.
1.64%
TechnipFMC plc
1.63%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.55%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
1.42%
nVent Electric Plc
1.41%
MKS, Inc.
1.40%
Performance Food Group Co.
1.33%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.29%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.28%
Frequently asked questions about XMMO and PAMC
How have the XMMO and PAMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 5, 2026, XMMO is up 15.5% year-to-date (YTD), while PAMC has returned 18.46%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMMO or PAMC?
Year-to-date, the XMMO ETF saw +$1.52B in flows, compared to -$11M for PAMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMMO or PAMC?
Over the past year, XMMO had a volatility of 21.51%, while PAMC experienced 18.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMMO or PAMC?
As of August 5, 2026, XMMO holds $7.41 B in assets under management (AUM), while PAMC manages $55.02 M.
What sectors do the XMMO and PAMC ETFs invest in?
XMMO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, PAMC focuses on Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the XMMO ETF and PAMC ETF?
XMMO top holdings include Curtiss-Wright Corp., Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and ATI, Inc.. PAMC holds in its top three: Curtiss-Wright Corp., Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMMO or PAMC?
XMMO holds 75 securities with 40.74% of its assets in the top 15. PAMC has 151 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
