Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMMOvsMCOWETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMMO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, MCOW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. XMMO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.49% for MCOW. XMMO is up 3.5% year-to-date (YTD) with +$230M in YTD flows. MCOW performs worse with -7.06% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMMO and MCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMMO vs MCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMMO MCOW | -1.24%-5.89% | +2.99%-8.89% | +3.50%-7.06% | +27.63%n/a | +100.39%n/a | +78.53%n/a |
| Flows | XMMO MCOW | +$124M- | +$315M- | +$230M- | +$1.09B- | +$3.22B- | +$3.43B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMMO MCOW | +16.94%+16.60% | +21.31%n/a | +19.42%n/a | +21.02%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XMMO MCOW | -5.81%-11.28% | -13.91%n/a | -24.88%n/a | -27.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMMO MCOW | 10d49d | 37dn/a | 289dn/a | 812dn/a |
XMMO | MCOW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $142.85 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $143.15 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMMO | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMMO | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $142.85 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | – |
| AuM | $5.50 B | $0.91 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.49% |
XMMO | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Midcap 400 Momentum Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 76 | 78 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | August 27, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMMO and MCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, XMMO is up 3.5% year-to-date (YTD), while MCOW has lost -7.06%. That puts XMMO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMMO or MCOW?
Year-to-date, the XMMO ETF saw +$230M in flows, compared to - for MCOW.
Which ETF is bigger: XMMO or MCOW?
As of March 12, 2026, XMMO holds $5.50 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCOW manages $0.91 M.
What sectors do the XMMO and MCOW ETFs invest in?
XMMO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, MCOW focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XMMO ETF and MCOW ETF?
XMMO top holdings include CIENA, CURTISS WRIGHT and TWILIO. MCOW holds in its top three: PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMMO or MCOW?
XMMO holds 78 securities with 44.5% of its assets in the top 15. MCOW has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.93%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.