XMHQvsSMAPETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, SMAP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. XMHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.6% for SMAP. XMHQ is up 5.58% year-to-date (YTD) with -$109M in YTD flows. SMAP performs better with 5.75% YTD performance, and -$26K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and SMAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMHQ vs SMAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ SMAP | +3.49%+5.98% | +1.10%+2.32% | +5.58%+5.75% | +17.52%+15.49% | +55.52%n/a | +50.56%n/a |
| Flows | XMHQ SMAP | -$31M- | -$108M-$26K | -$109M-$26K | -$305M-$26K | +$3.62B- | +$4.11B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ SMAP | +17.13%+18.63% | +15.84%+16.31% | +18.58%n/a | +20.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ SMAP | -7.94%-9.95% | -8.74%-9.95% | -24.40%n/a | -25.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ SMAP | 45d68d | 116d68d | 415dn/a | 597dn/a |
Trading data
XMHQ | SMAP | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $107.97 | $26.09 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $107.31 | $26.28 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMAP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexXMHQ | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XMHQ | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $107.97 | $26.09 |
| 1D performance | +0.62% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $5.22 B | $1.31 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
XMHQ | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 54 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | October 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMHQ
USA
91.04%
Other
8.96%
SMAP
USA
94.92%
Other
5.08%
Sectors
XMHQ
Industrials
20.68%
Health Care
20.27%
Financials
14.96%
Materials
10.45%
Consumer Discreti.
10.08%
Information Techn.
8.91%
Other
14.64%
SMAP
Industrials
18.99%
Financials
14.65%
Health Care
14.16%
Information Techn.
12.84%
Consumer Discreti.
8.3%
Materials
7.57%
Other
23.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.31%
SMAP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
XMHQ
TECHNIPFMC PLC
4.98%
UTD THERAPEUT
3.88%
ILLUMINA
3.51%
MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC
2.92%
US65290E1010
2.72%
CARLISLE COMPANIES
2.68%
TWILIO
2.59%
ROYAL GOLD
2.58%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
2.55%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.34%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
2.27%
EXELIXIS
2.12%
PENUMBRA
2.12%
US87422Q1094
2.07%
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS
1.99%
SMAP
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
3.71%
CASEYS GENERAL STORES
3.32%
WEST PHARM SVCS
3.10%
STIFEL FINANCIAL
3.05%
MATADOR RESOURCES
3.01%
MKS INSTRUMENTS
2.87%
CURTISS WRIGHT
2.77%
WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
2.74%
WATSCO
2.64%
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP
2.63%
MARKET CORPORATION
2.54%
RANGE RESOURCES
2.54%
EAGLE MATERIALS
2.38%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
2.28%
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
2.26%
Frequently asked questions about XMHQ and SMAP
How have the XMHQ and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 1, 2026, XMHQ is up 5.58% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has returned 5.75%. That puts SMAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or SMAP?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$109M in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or SMAP?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 15.84%, while SMAP experienced 16.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or SMAP?
As of May 1, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.22 B in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.31 M.
What sectors do the XMHQ and SMAP ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and SMAP ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include TECHNIPFMC PLC, UTD THERAPEUT and ILLUMINA. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and WEST PHARM SVCS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or SMAP?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 41.31% of its assets in the top 15. SMAP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
