Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMHQvsSMAPETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, SMAP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. XMHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.6% for SMAP. XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. SMAP performs worse with -2.6% YTD performance, and -$26K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and SMAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMHQ vs SMAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ SMAP | -4.84%-7.76% | -1.20%-3.92% | -0.38%-2.60% | +15.18%+7.37% | +55.87%n/a | +43.91%n/a |
| Flows | XMHQ SMAP | -$60M+$620K | -$64M-$26K | -$43M-$26K | -$949M-$26K | +$3.94B- | +$4.22B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ SMAP | +14.56%+15.01% | +20.42%+20.80% | +18.65%n/a | +20.76%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ SMAP | -6.79%-8.85% | -13.30%-14.26% | -24.40%n/a | -25.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ SMAP | 50d33d | 43d46d | 415dn/a | 597dn/a |
XMHQ | SMAP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.06 | $24.12 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $101.96 | $24.18 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMHQ | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMHQ | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.06 | $24.12 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $5.00 B | $1.20 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.6% |
XMHQ | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 56 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | October 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMHQ and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has lost -2.6%. That puts XMHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or SMAP?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or SMAP?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 20.42%, while SMAP experienced 20.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or SMAP?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.20 M.
What sectors do the XMHQ and SMAP ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and SMAP ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include ILLUMINA, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and TECHNIPFMC PLC. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CURTISS WRIGHT and STIFEL FINANCIAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or SMAP?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 40.02% of its assets in the top 15. SMAP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.75%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
