Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMHQvsQVMMETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, QVMM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. XMHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.15% for QVMM. XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. QVMM performs better with 2.22% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and QVMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMHQ vs QVMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ QVMM | -4.84%-5.69% | -1.20%+1.07% | -0.38%+2.22% | +15.18%+20.34% | +55.87%+47.16% | +43.91%n/a |
| Flows | XMHQ QVMM | -$60M+$3M | -$64M+$3M | -$43M+$3M | -$949M+$168K | +$3.94B+$31M | +$4.22B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ QVMM | +14.56%+14.76% | +20.42%+20.59% | +18.65%+17.88% | +20.76%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ QVMM | -6.79%-6.81% | -13.30%-14.90% | -24.40%-23.85% | -25.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ QVMM | 50d11d | 43d46d | 415d379d | 597dn/a |
XMHQ | QVMM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.06 | $31.43 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $101.96 | $31.48 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMHQ | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMHQ | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.06 | $31.43 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $5.00 B | $383.00 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.15% |
XMHQ | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 345 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMHQ and QVMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMM has returned 2.22%. That puts QVMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or QVMM?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to +$3M for QVMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or QVMM?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 20.42%, while QVMM experienced 20.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or QVMM?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while QVMM manages $383.00 M.
What sectors do the XMHQ and QVMM ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, QVMM focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and QVMM ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include ILLUMINA, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and TECHNIPFMC PLC. QVMM holds in its top three: CIENA, PURE STORAGE and US19247G1076.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or QVMM?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 40.02% of its assets in the top 15. QVMM has 358 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.29%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
