XMHQvsQVMMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, QVMM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. XMHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.15% for QVMM. XMHQ is up 15.47% year-to-date (YTD) with -$115M in YTD flows. QVMM performs worse with 12.65% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and QVMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMHQ vs QVMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ QVMM | +5.51%+2.60% | +2.88%-2.47% | +15.47%+12.65% | +15.39%+16.07% | +65.65%+64.75% | +58.60%+40.09% |
| Flows | XMHQ QVMM | +$42M+$676K | +$87M+$2M | -$115M+$5M | -$184M+$2M | +$2.69B+$38M | +$4.06B+$98M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ QVMM | +12.08%+11.94% | +14.55%+14.81% | +18.18%+17.55% | +20.43%+19.28% |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ QVMM | -6.74%-8.70% | -8.39%-8.70% | -24.40%-23.85% | -25.16%-23.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ QVMM | 75d75d | 102d75d | 415d379d | 597d379d |
Trading data
XMHQ | QVMM | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $119.81 | $34.63 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $117.79 | $34.28 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XMHQ | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
XMHQ | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $119.81 | $34.63 |
| 1D performance | +1.71% | +1.02% |
| AuM | $5.68 B | $419.01 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
XMHQ | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 360 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMHQ
USA
92.21%
Other
7.79%
QVMM
USA
96.06%
Other
3.94%
Sectors
XMHQ
Industrials
22.59%
Finance
16.68%
Healthcare
14.41%
Technology
12.88%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.51%
Energy
7.92%
Other
15.02%
QVMM
Finance
23.3%
Industrials
17.38%
Technology
14.19%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.8%
Healthcare
9.1%
Other
25.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.71%
QVMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.79%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
4.61%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
3.78%
nVent Electric Plc
3.46%
Exelixis, Inc.
3.36%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
3.33%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.69%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.67%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.26%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.25%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
2.15%
Evercore, Inc.
2.06%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.05%
DocuSign, Inc.
2.04%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.02%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
1.97%
QVMM
Twilio, Inc.
1.47%
Okta, Inc.
1.10%
TechnipFMC plc
0.92%
nVent Electric Plc
0.80%
ATI, Inc.
0.79%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.72%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.71%
XPO, Inc.
0.71%
Entegris, Inc.
0.70%
United Therapeutics Corp.
0.67%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.66%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.65%
Woodward, Inc.
0.63%
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.63%
Reliance, Inc.
0.63%
Frequently asked questions about XMHQ and QVMM
How have the XMHQ and QVMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, XMHQ is up 15.47% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMM has returned 12.65%. That puts XMHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or QVMM?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$115M in flows, compared to +$5M for QVMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or QVMM?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 14.55%, while QVMM experienced 14.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or QVMM?
As of October 30, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.68 B in assets under management (AUM), while QVMM manages $419.01 M.
What sectors do the XMHQ and QVMM ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QVMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and QVMM ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include TechnipFMC plc, Medpace Holdings, Inc. and nVent Electric Plc. QVMM holds in its top three: Twilio, Inc., Okta, Inc. and TechnipFMC plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or QVMM?
XMHQ holds 78 securities with 40.71% of its assets in the top 15. QVMM has 360 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.79%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
