Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMHQvsPTMCETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) is part of the Alternatives segment. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, PTMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. XMHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.6% for PTMC. XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. PTMC performs better with 1.35% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and PTMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMHQ vs PTMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ PTMC | -4.84%-6.16% | -1.20%+0.29% | -0.38%+1.35% | +15.18%+6.69% | +55.87%+22.20% | +43.91%+8.23% |
| Flows | XMHQ PTMC | -$60M-$4M | -$64M-$20M | -$43M-$13M | -$949M-$52M | +$3.94B-$68M | +$4.22B-$79M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ PTMC | +14.56%+15.47% | +20.42%+12.71% | +18.65%+14.23% | +20.76%+12.80% |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ PTMC | -6.79%-7.30% | -13.30%-7.30% | -24.40%-15.12% | -25.16%-16.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ PTMC | 50d19d | 43d19d | 415d473d | 597d862d |
XMHQ | PTMC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.06 | $36.16 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $101.96 | $36.21 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMHQ | PTMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMHQ | PTMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.06 | $36.16 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $5.00 B | $374.44 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.6% |
XMHQ | PTMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 382 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | June 11, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMHQ and PTMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD), while PTMC has returned 1.35%. That puts PTMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or PTMC?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to -$13M for PTMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or PTMC?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 20.42%, while PTMC experienced 12.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or PTMC?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while PTMC manages $374.44 M.
What sectors do the XMHQ and PTMC ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, PTMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and PTMC ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include ILLUMINA, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and TECHNIPFMC PLC. PTMC holds in its top three: CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or PTMC?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 40.02% of its assets in the top 15. PTMC has 399 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.84%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
