XMHQvsMDYGETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, MDYG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. XMHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.15% for MDYG. XMHQ is up 12.01% year-to-date (YTD) with -$181M in YTD flows. MDYG performs better with 13.86% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and MDYG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMHQ vs MDYG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ MDYG | -3.44%-5.72% | +3.36%-4.85% | +12.01%+13.86% | +8.37%+13.67% | +49.40%+51.74% | +65.47%+43.42% |
| Flows | XMHQ MDYG | +$15M+$17M | -$1.49B-$67M | -$181M+$4M | -$470M+$265K | +$3.07B+$21M | +$4.01B+$314M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ MDYG | +11.88%+15.24% | +14.92%+17.66% | +18.42%+18.94% | +20.55%+20.76% |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ MDYG | -4.94%-8.24% | -8.39%-9.91% | -24.40%-25.46% | -25.16%-29.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ MDYG | 33d32d | 102d45d | 415d379d | 597d834d |
Trading data
XMHQ | MDYG | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $114.35 | $104.94 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $114.89 | $105.01 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XMHQ | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XMHQ | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $114.35 | $104.94 |
| 1D performance | -0.47% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $5.45 B | $2.78 B |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
XMHQ | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 245 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | November 8, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMHQ
USA
93.36%
Other
6.64%
MDYG
USA
94.73%
Other
5.27%
Sectors
XMHQ
Industrials
20.86%
Healthcare
17.19%
Finance
16.05%
Technology
13.64%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.1%
Energy
7.23%
Other
14.94%
MDYG
Industrials
20.61%
Technology
19.17%
Healthcare
15.46%
Finance
14.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.26%
Other
21.06%
Advertisement
Diversification
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.27%
MDYG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.58%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
4.17%
Illumina, Inc.
4.02%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
3.19%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.03%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
2.99%
Everpure, Inc.
2.96%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.83%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.77%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.58%
nVent Electric Plc
2.56%
Evercore, Inc.
2.13%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.10%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.05%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.00%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
1.87%
MDYG
Twilio, Inc.
1.65%
TechnipFMC plc
1.57%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
1.47%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.42%
ATI, Inc.
1.41%
nVent Electric Plc
1.37%
Everpure, Inc.
1.34%
Okta, Inc.
1.31%
XPO, Inc.
1.30%
United Therapeutics Corp.
1.21%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.20%
Woodward, Inc.
1.18%
RB Global, Inc.
1.12%
Roku, Inc.
1.04%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about XMHQ and MDYG
How have the XMHQ and MDYG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, XMHQ is up 12.01% year-to-date (YTD), while MDYG has returned 13.86%. That puts MDYG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or MDYG?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$181M in flows, compared to +$4M for MDYG.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or MDYG?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 14.92%, while MDYG experienced 17.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or MDYG?
As of September 18, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while MDYG manages $2.78 B.
What sectors do the XMHQ and MDYG ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, MDYG focuses on Industrials, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and MDYG ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include TechnipFMC plc, Illumina, Inc. and Medpace Holdings, Inc.. MDYG holds in its top three: Twilio, Inc., TechnipFMC plc and Curtiss-Wright Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or MDYG?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 41.27% of its assets in the top 15. MDYG has 245 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.58%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
