XMHQvsMDYGETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, MDYG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. XMHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.15% for MDYG. XMHQ is up 13.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$209M in YTD flows. MDYG performs better with 17.27% YTD performance, and -$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and MDYG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMHQ vs MDYG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ MDYG | +1.26%-2.09% | +8.29%+4.29% | +13.71%+17.27% | +16.08%+22.67% | +49.66%+51.70% | +63.20%+44.66% |
| Flows | XMHQ MDYG | -$57M+$27M | -$100M+$41M | -$209M-$7M | -$74M-$2M | +$3.20B+$3M | +$3.99B+$357M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ MDYG | +14.31%+18.20% | +15.17%+17.64% | +18.50%+18.89% | +20.60%+20.71% |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ MDYG | -5.06%-6.04% | -8.74%-9.91% | -24.40%-25.46% | -25.16%-29.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ MDYG | 27d34d | 116d45d | 415d379d | 597d834d |
Trading data
XMHQ | MDYG | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 2:17 PM | $117.36 | $109.19 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $116.22 | $108.20 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XMHQ | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 2:17 PM
Live
Closed
XMHQ | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $117.36 | $109.19 |
| 1D performance | +0.98% | +0.91% |
| AuM | $5.51 B | $2.85 B |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
XMHQ | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 244 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | November 8, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMHQ
USA
92.89%
Other
7.11%
MDYG
USA
94.7%
Other
5.3%
Sectors
XMHQ
Industrials
22.9%
Healthcare
16.56%
Finance
15.44%
Technology
12.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.25%
Other
21.1%
MDYG
Industrials
22.33%
Technology
21.55%
Healthcare
13.25%
Finance
13.12%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.78%
Other
19.98%
Advertisement
Diversification
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.1%
MDYG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.48%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
3.82%
Illumina, Inc.
3.73%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.41%
nVent Electric Plc
3.19%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
3.15%
Everpure, Inc.
3.02%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.94%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.87%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.73%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.48%
Evercore, Inc.
2.44%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.43%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
2.07%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.92%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.91%
MDYG
Twilio, Inc.
1.65%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.61%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
1.47%
nVent Electric Plc
1.44%
ATI, Inc.
1.42%
TechnipFMC plc
1.39%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.36%
MasTec, Inc.
1.35%
Woodward, Inc.
1.33%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
1.31%
Everpure, Inc.
1.31%
XPO, Inc.
1.27%
United Therapeutics Corp.
1.21%
Okta, Inc.
1.21%
RB Global, Inc.
1.14%
Frequently asked questions about XMHQ and MDYG
How have the XMHQ and MDYG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, XMHQ is up 13.71% year-to-date (YTD), while MDYG has returned 17.27%. That puts MDYG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or MDYG?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$209M in flows, compared to -$7M for MDYG.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or MDYG?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 15.17%, while MDYG experienced 17.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or MDYG?
As of August 3, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.51 B in assets under management (AUM), while MDYG manages $2.85 B.
What sectors do the XMHQ and MDYG ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, MDYG focuses on Industrials, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and MDYG ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include TechnipFMC plc, Illumina, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corp.. MDYG holds in its top three: Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and Curtiss-Wright Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or MDYG?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 42.1% of its assets in the top 15. MDYG has 244 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.48%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
