XMHQvsMDYETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. State Street SPDR S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust (MDY) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, MDY's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. XMHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.23% for MDY. XMHQ is up 12.24% year-to-date (YTD) with -$207M in YTD flows. MDY performs better with 14.46% YTD performance, and -$1.03B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and MDY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMHQ vs MDY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ MDY | +1.60%-2.24% | +7.03%+3.66% | +12.24%+14.46% | +12.21%+19.38% | +46.42%+43.00% | +62.05%+48.30% |
| Flows | XMHQ MDY | -$65M-$898M | -$95M-$533M | -$207M-$1.03B | -$76M-$683M | +$3.22B-$987M | +$3.99B-$2.31B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ MDY | +14.27%+14.83% | +15.33%+15.73% | +18.48%+17.81% | +20.60%+19.77% |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ MDY | -5.06%-4.24% | -8.74%-8.78% | -24.40%-23.91% | -25.16%-23.91% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ MDY | 27d26d | 116d53d | 415d379d | 597d379d |
Trading data
XMHQ | MDY | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $114.92 | $686.32 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $114.62 | $687.19 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XMHQ | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XMHQ | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $114.92 | $686.32 |
| 1D performance | +0.26% | -0.13% |
| AuM | $5.44 B | $26.44 B |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.23% |
Characteristics
XMHQ | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | S&P MidCap 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 400 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | May 4, 1995 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMHQ
USA
92.89%
Other
7.11%
MDY
USA
95.41%
Other
4.59%
Sectors
XMHQ
Industrials
22.9%
Healthcare
16.56%
Finance
15.44%
Technology
12.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.25%
Other
21.1%
MDY
Finance
21.51%
Industrials
18.53%
Technology
15.28%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.61%
Healthcare
8.49%
Other
25.58%
Advertisement
Diversification
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.1%
MDY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
3.82%
Illumina, Inc.
3.73%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.41%
nVent Electric Plc
3.19%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
3.15%
Everpure, Inc.
3.02%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.94%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.87%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.73%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.48%
Evercore, Inc.
2.44%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.43%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
2.07%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.92%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.91%
MDY
Twilio, Inc.
0.86%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.84%
MKS, Inc.
0.82%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.77%
nVent Electric Plc
0.75%
Entegris, Inc.
0.75%
ATI, Inc.
0.74%
Illumina, Inc.
0.73%
TechnipFMC plc
0.72%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.70%
MasTec, Inc.
0.70%
Woodward, Inc.
0.69%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.68%
Everpure, Inc.
0.68%
XPO, Inc.
0.66%
Frequently asked questions about XMHQ and MDY
How have the XMHQ and MDY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, XMHQ is up 12.24% year-to-date (YTD), while MDY has returned 14.46%. That puts MDY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or MDY?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$207M in flows, compared to -$1.03B for MDY.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or MDY?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 15.33%, while MDY experienced 15.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or MDY?
As of July 30, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while MDY manages $26.44 B.
What sectors do the XMHQ and MDY ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, MDY focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and MDY ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include TechnipFMC plc, Illumina, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corp.. MDY holds in its top three: Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and MKS, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or MDY?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 42.1% of its assets in the top 15. MDY has 400 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.09%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
