XMHQvsMCOWETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, MCOW's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. XMHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.49% for MCOW. XMHQ is up 12.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$271M in YTD flows. MCOW performs worse with 9.83% YTD performance, and -$4K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and MCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XMHQ vs MCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ MCOW | -3.86%-4.28% | +4.61%+4.28% | +12.56%+9.83% | +10.33%+5.21% | +50.12%n/a | +63.12%n/a |
| Flows | XMHQ MCOW | +$467M- | -$1.04B- | +$271M-$4K | +$245M-$4K | +$3.52B- | +$4.46B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ MCOW | +11.90%+15.19% | +14.96%+17.34% | +18.43%n/a | +20.56%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ MCOW | -4.94%-6.58% | -8.39%-14.99% | -24.40%n/a | -25.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ MCOW | 32d35d | 102d246d | 415dn/a | 597dn/a |
Trading data
XMHQ | MCOW | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 7:42 PM | $114.48 | |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $114.89 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XMHQ | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 7:42 PM
Live
Closed
XMHQ | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $114.48 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | – |
| AuM | $5.93 B | $1.08 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
XMHQ | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 77 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | August 27, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XMHQ
USA
93.36%
Other
6.64%
MCOW
USA
93.56%
Other
6.44%
Sectors
XMHQ
Industrials
20.86%
Healthcare
17.19%
Finance
16.05%
Technology
13.64%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.1%
Energy
7.23%
Other
14.94%
MCOW
Technology
35.24%
Industrials
17.43%
Healthcare
14.85%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.06%
Other
23.42%
Diversification
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.27%
MCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.14%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
4.17%
Illumina, Inc.
4.02%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
3.19%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.03%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
2.99%
Everpure, Inc.
2.96%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.83%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.77%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.58%
nVent Electric Plc
2.56%
Evercore, Inc.
2.13%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.10%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.05%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.00%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
1.87%
MCOW
Everpure, Inc.
4.91%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
3.65%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp.
3.62%
DocuSign, Inc.
3.60%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
3.58%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.03%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.67%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.57%
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc
2.52%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
2.32%
Rambus, Inc.
2.29%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.18%
DT Midstream, Inc.
2.15%
Qualys, Inc.
2.03%
Okta, Inc.
2.02%
Frequently asked questions about XMHQ and MCOW
How have the XMHQ and MCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, XMHQ is up 12.56% year-to-date (YTD), while MCOW has returned 9.83%. That puts XMHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or MCOW?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw +$271M in flows, compared to -$4K for MCOW.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or MCOW?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 14.96%, while MCOW experienced 17.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or MCOW?
As of September 17, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.93 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCOW manages $1.08 M.
What sectors do the XMHQ and MCOW ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, MCOW focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and MCOW ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include TechnipFMC plc, Illumina, Inc. and Medpace Holdings, Inc.. MCOW holds in its top three: Everpure, Inc., Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or MCOW?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 41.27% of its assets in the top 15. MCOW has 77 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.14%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
