Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

XMHQvsMCOWETF Comparison

ETF 1
XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+0.96%
VS
ETF 2
MCOW

Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+0.96%

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, MCOW's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. XMHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.49% for MCOW. XMHQ is up 13.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$209M in YTD flows. MCOW performs worse with 10.29% YTD performance, and -$4K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and MCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

XMHQ vs MCOW performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 3

Cumulative Flows

-60,000,000-50,000,000-40,000,000-30,000,000-20,000,000-10,000,0000Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 3

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
XMHQ
MCOW
+1.26%+0.52%
+8.29%+9.69%
+13.71%+10.29%
+16.08%n/a
+49.66%n/a
+63.20%n/a
Flows
XMHQ
MCOW
-$57M-
-$100M-
-$209M-$4K
-$74M-
+$3.20B-
+$3.99B-
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
XMHQ
MCOW
+14.31%+18.38%
+15.17%n/a
+18.50%n/a
+20.60%n/a
Max drawdown
XMHQ
MCOW
-5.06%-4.98%
-8.74%n/a
-24.40%n/a
-25.16%n/a
Max drawdown duration
XMHQ
MCOW
27d25d
116dn/a
415dn/a
597dn/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
XMHQ
MCOW
Last sale
8/4/2026 at 2:30 PM
$117.10
Previous close
08/03/2026
$116.22
Consolidated volume
08/03/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
XMHQ
MCOW
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
XMHQ
MCOW
Last price
$117.10
1D performance
+0.76%
AuM$5.51 B$1.08 M
E/R0.31%0.49%
Characteristics
XMHQ
MCOW
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderInvescoPACER ETFs
BenchmarkS&P MidCap 400 Quality IndexS&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index
N° of holdings8080
Asset classEquities-
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 1, 2006August 27, 2025
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

XMHQ
USA
92.89%
Other
7.11%
MCOW
USA
93.93%
Other
6.07%

Sectors

XMHQ
Industrials
22.9%
Healthcare
16.56%
Finance
15.44%
Technology
12.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.25%
Other
21.1%
MCOW
Technology
32.78%
Industrials
19.94%
Healthcare
14.37%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.42%
Other
23.49%
Advertisement

Diversification

XMHQ

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

42.1%
MCOW

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

42.47%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
3.82%
Illumina, Inc.
3.73%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.41%
nVent Electric Plc
3.19%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
3.15%
Everpure, Inc.
3.02%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.94%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.87%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.73%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.48%
Evercore, Inc.
2.44%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.43%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
2.07%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.92%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.91%
MCOW
Everpure, Inc.
4.36%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
4.03%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp.
4.02%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
3.29%
DocuSign, Inc.
2.94%
Rambus, Inc.
2.86%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.73%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
2.62%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.58%
DT Midstream, Inc.
2.33%
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc
2.28%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.26%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
2.22%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
1.98%
RB Global, Inc.
1.97%
Frequently asked questions about XMHQ and MCOW

How have the XMHQ and MCOW ETFs performed in 2026?

As of August 3, 2026, XMHQ is up 13.71% year-to-date (YTD), while MCOW has returned 10.29%. That puts XMHQ better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or MCOW?

Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$209M in flows, compared to -$4K for MCOW.

Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or MCOW?

As of August 3, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.51 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCOW manages $1.08 M.

What sectors do the XMHQ and MCOW ETFs invest in?

XMHQ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, MCOW focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and MCOW ETF?

XMHQ top holdings include TechnipFMC plc, Illumina, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corp.. MCOW holds in its top three: Everpure, Inc., Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or MCOW?

XMHQ holds 80 securities with 42.1% of its assets in the top 15. MCOW has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.47%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF INVESTOR TOOLS

Build and Analyze Your ETF Portfolio Like a Pro

Create your own ETF portfolio in minutes and instantly see allocations, exposures, performance, and risk. Visualize diversification across asset classes, regions, and sectors. Stress-test ideas, compare benchmarks, and refine your strategy with professional-grade analytics.

Portfolio Builder