Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMHQvsMCOWETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, MCOW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. XMHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.49% for MCOW. XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. MCOW performs worse with -6.79% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and MCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMHQ vs MCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ MCOW | -4.84%-6.59% | -1.20%-8.20% | -0.38%-6.79% | +15.18%n/a | +55.87%n/a | +43.91%n/a |
| Flows | XMHQ MCOW | -$60M- | -$64M- | -$43M- | -$949M- | +$3.94B- | +$4.22B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ MCOW | +14.56%+16.62% | +20.42%n/a | +18.65%n/a | +20.76%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ MCOW | -6.79%-11.28% | -13.30%n/a | -24.40%n/a | -25.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ MCOW | 50d50d | 43dn/a | 415dn/a | 597dn/a |
XMHQ | MCOW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.06 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $101.96 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMHQ | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMHQ | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.06 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | – |
| AuM | $5.00 B | $0.91 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.49% |
XMHQ | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 78 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2006 | August 27, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMHQ and MCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD), while MCOW has lost -6.79%. That puts XMHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or MCOW?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to - for MCOW.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or MCOW?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCOW manages $0.91 M.
What sectors do the XMHQ and MCOW ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, MCOW focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and MCOW ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include ILLUMINA, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and TECHNIPFMC PLC. MCOW holds in its top three: PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or MCOW?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 40.02% of its assets in the top 15. MCOW has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.93%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
