Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMHQvsIVOOETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. XMHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, IVOO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. XMHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.07% for IVOO. XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. IVOO performs better with 1.32% YTD performance, and +$77M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMHQ and IVOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMHQ vs IVOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMHQ IVOO | -4.84%-6.12% | -1.20%+0.26% | -0.38%+1.32% | +15.18%+18.58% | +55.87%+45.16% | +43.91%+33.85% |
| Flows | XMHQ IVOO | -$60M+$46M | -$64M+$94M | -$43M+$77M | -$949M+$362M | +$3.94B+$963M | +$4.22B+$1.25B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMHQ IVOO | +14.56%+15.47% | +20.42%+20.91% | +18.65%+17.95% | +20.76%+19.59% |
| Max drawdown | XMHQ IVOO | -6.79%-7.27% | -13.30%-15.10% | -24.40%-24.02% | -25.16%-24.02% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMHQ IVOO | 50d19d | 43d46d | 415d379d | 597d379d |
XMHQ | IVOO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.06 | $113.26 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $101.96 | $113.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMHQ | IVOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMHQ | IVOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.06 | $113.26 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $5.00 B | $3.10 B |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.07% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMHQ and IVOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ is down -0.38% year-to-date (YTD), while IVOO has returned 1.32%. That puts IVOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMHQ or IVOO?
Year-to-date, the XMHQ ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to +$77M for IVOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMHQ or IVOO?
Over the past year, XMHQ had a volatility of 20.42%, while IVOO experienced 20.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMHQ or IVOO?
As of March 13, 2026, XMHQ holds $5.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while IVOO manages $3.10 B.
What sectors do the XMHQ and IVOO ETFs invest in?
XMHQ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, IVOO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the XMHQ ETF and IVOO ETF?
XMHQ top holdings include ILLUMINA, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and TECHNIPFMC PLC. IVOO holds in its top three: CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMHQ or IVOO?
XMHQ holds 80 securities with 40.02% of its assets in the top 15. IVOO has 401 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.53%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
