Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XMAGvsILCVETF Comparison
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. XMAG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.04% for ILCV. XMAG is up 1.45% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35M in YTD flows. ILCV performs worse with 0.84% YTD performance, and +$113K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMAG and ILCV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMAG vs ILCV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMAG ILCV | -2.38%-2.94% | +0.04%-0.05% | +1.45%+0.84% | +18.19%+20.46% | n/a+65.51% | n/a+74.64% |
| Flows | XMAG ILCV | +$10M+$19M | +$62M+$13M | +$35M+$113K | +$107M+$32M | -+$16M | -+$144M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMAG ILCV | +11.10%+9.34% | +16.25%+15.49% | n/a+12.64% | n/a+14.39% |
| Max drawdown | XMAG ILCV | -2.67%-3.00% | -12.39%-12.22% | n/a-15.16% | n/a-18.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | XMAG ILCV | 10d31d | 46d77d | n/a132d | n/a561d |
XMAG | ILCV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 6:16 PM | $22.56 | $94.30 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $22.71 | $95.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XMAG | ILCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XMAG | ILCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.56 | $94.30 |
| 1D performance | -0.64% | -0.89% |
| AuM | $138.72 M | $1.18 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.04% |
XMAG | ILCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Defiance ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 466 | 360 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 21, 2024 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XMAG and ILCV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, XMAG is up 1.45% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCV has returned 0.84%. That puts XMAG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XMAG or ILCV?
Year-to-date, the XMAG ETF saw +$35M in flows, compared to +$113K for ILCV.
Which ETF is more volatile: XMAG or ILCV?
Over the past year, XMAG had a volatility of 16.25%, while ILCV experienced 15.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: XMAG or ILCV?
As of March 11, 2026, XMAG holds $138.72 M in assets under management (AUM), while ILCV manages $1.18 B.
What sectors do the XMAG and ILCV ETFs invest in?
XMAG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, ILCV focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XMAG ETF and ILCV ETF?
XMAG top holdings include BROADCOM LIMITED, LILLY and JPMORGAN CHASE. ILCV holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and BERKSHIRE HATHWAY.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMAG or ILCV?
XMAG holds 490 securities with 22.56% of its assets in the top 15. ILCV has 382 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.66%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
