Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XLBIvsFMATETF Comparison
The Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income Fund
The Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income Fund (XLBI) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) is part of the US Materials segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Materials. XLBI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.08% for FMAT. XLBI is up 2.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. FMAT performs better with 9.54% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XLBI and FMAT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XLBI vs FMAT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XLBI FMAT | -5.39%-5.48% | +3.70%+12.67% | +2.29%+9.54% | n/a+21.90% | n/a+38.32% | n/a+44.96% |
| Flows | XLBI FMAT | -+$6M | +$3M+$43M | +$3M+$33M | --$79M | --$38M | -+$78M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XLBI FMAT | +11.39%+19.63% | n/a+21.01% | n/a+17.58% | n/a+19.54% |
| Max drawdown | XLBI FMAT | -5.71%-7.30% | n/a-14.66% | n/a-23.21% | n/a-25.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | XLBI FMAT | 10d9d | n/a57d | n/a430d | n/a679d |
XLBI | FMAT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.57 | $57.60 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $23.65 | $58.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XLBI | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XLBI | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.57 | $57.60 |
| 1D performance | -0.34% | -0.72% |
| AuM | $5.20 M | $532.35 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XLBI and FMAT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, XLBI is up 2.29% year-to-date (YTD), while FMAT has returned 9.54%. That puts FMAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XLBI or FMAT?
Year-to-date, the XLBI ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$33M for FMAT.
Which ETF is bigger: XLBI or FMAT?
As of March 11, 2026, XLBI holds $5.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while FMAT manages $532.35 M.
What sectors do the XLBI and FMAT ETFs invest in?
XLBI leans toward sectors like Materials. Meanwhile, FMAT focuses on Materials.
What are the top holdings of the XLBI ETF and FMAT ETF?
XLBI top holdings include IE000S9YS762, NEWMONT CORP and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. FMAT holds in its top three: IE000S9YS762, NEWMONT CORP and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: XLBI or FMAT?
XLBI holds 25 securities with 75.9% of its assets in the top 15. FMAT has 105 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.23%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
