Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XJRvsQVMSETF Comparison
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. XJR's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, QVMS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. XJR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.15% for QVMS. XJR is up 0.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. QVMS performs better with 1.73% YTD performance, and -$302K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJR and QVMS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XJR vs QVMS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJR QVMS | -7.22%-6.76% | -1.98%-0.99% | +0.62%+1.73% | +17.89%+20.81% | +35.76%+39.00% | +12.00%n/a |
| Flows | XJR QVMS | +$9M- | +$11M-$344K | +$13M-$302K | +$11M+$31K | +$56M+$57M | +$96M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJR QVMS | +17.03%+16.33% | +22.39%+22.42% | +20.61%+20.43% | +21.57%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XJR QVMS | -8.20%-7.60% | -15.49%-15.71% | -27.00%-27.75% | -27.00%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XJR QVMS | 31d31d | 46d49d | 409d380d | 409dn/a |
XJR | QVMS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.80 | $28.70 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $42.82 | $28.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XJR | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XJR | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.80 | $28.70 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $117.56 M | $211.00 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.15% |
XJR | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 514 | 503 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2020 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XJR and QVMS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XJR is up 0.62% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMS has returned 1.73%. That puts QVMS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XJR or QVMS?
Year-to-date, the XJR ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to -$302K for QVMS.
Which ETF is more volatile: XJR or QVMS?
Over the past year, XJR had a volatility of 22.39%, while QVMS experienced 22.42%.
Which ETF is bigger: XJR or QVMS?
As of March 13, 2026, XJR holds $117.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVMS manages $211.00 M.
What sectors do the XJR and QVMS ETFs invest in?
XJR leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, QVMS focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the XJR ETF and QVMS ETF?
XJR top holdings include US0669224778, ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES and ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC. QVMS holds in its top three: ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, SANMINA CORP and TTM TECHNOLOGIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: XJR or QVMS?
XJR holds 544 securities with 9.72% of its assets in the top 15. QVMS has 539 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.71%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
