Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XJHvsSPMDETF Comparison
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. XJH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.03% for SPMD. XJH is up 1.04% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. SPMD performs better with 1.49% YTD performance, and +$388M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJH and SPMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XJH vs SPMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJH SPMD | -5.82%-5.11% | -0.23%+0.21% | +1.04%+1.49% | +17.11%+16.90% | +43.67%+45.57% | +31.91%+36.32% |
| Flows | XJH SPMD | +$7M+$256M | +$7M+$534M | +$5M+$388M | +$49M+$1.88B | +$182M+$6.76B | +$275M+$8.62B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJH SPMD | +15.90%+15.47% | +21.08%+20.96% | +18.24%+18.02% | +19.82%+19.65% |
| Max drawdown | XJH SPMD | -7.61%-7.12% | -15.00%-15.07% | -24.38%-23.98% | -24.99%-23.98% |
| Max drawdown duration | XJH SPMD | 18d18d | 46d46d | 379d379d | 815d379d |
XJH | SPMD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.05 | $58.70 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $45.02 | $58.77 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XJH | SPMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XJH | SPMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.05 | $58.70 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $342.46 M | $15.62 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.03% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XJH and SPMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, XJH is up 1.04% year-to-date (YTD), while SPMD has returned 1.49%. That puts SPMD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XJH or SPMD?
Year-to-date, the XJH ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$388M for SPMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: XJH or SPMD?
Over the past year, XJH had a volatility of 21.08%, while SPMD experienced 20.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: XJH or SPMD?
As of March 12, 2026, XJH holds $342.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while SPMD manages $15.62 B.
What sectors do the XJH and SPMD ETFs invest in?
XJH leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, SPMD focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the XJH ETF and SPMD ETF?
XJH top holdings include CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. SPMD holds in its top three: CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XJH or SPMD?
XJH holds 356 securities with 12.01% of its assets in the top 15. SPMD has 400 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.53%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
