Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XJHvsSMAPETF Comparison
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. XJH's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, SMAP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. XJH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.6% for SMAP. XJH is up 1.04% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. SMAP performs worse with -2.29% YTD performance, and -$26K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJH and SMAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XJH vs SMAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJH SMAP | -5.82%-6.61% | -0.23%-3.88% | +1.04%-2.29% | +17.11%+5.92% | +43.67%n/a | +31.91%n/a |
| Flows | XJH SMAP | +$7M-$26K | +$7M-$26K | +$5M-$26K | +$49M-$26K | +$182M- | +$275M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJH SMAP | +15.90%+15.00% | +21.08%+20.86% | +18.24%n/a | +19.82%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XJH SMAP | -7.61%-8.56% | -15.00%-14.26% | -24.38%n/a | -24.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XJH SMAP | 18d32d | 46d46d | 379dn/a | 815dn/a |
XJH | SMAP | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.02 | $24.18 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $46.04 | $24.72 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XJH | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XJH | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.02 | $24.18 |
| 1D performance | -2.22% | -2.16% |
| AuM | $342.46 M | $1.21 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.6% |
XJH | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 346 | 56 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2020 | October 23, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XJH and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, XJH is up 1.04% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has lost -2.29%. That puts XJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XJH or SMAP?
Year-to-date, the XJH ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: XJH or SMAP?
Over the past year, XJH had a volatility of 21.08%, while SMAP experienced 20.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: XJH or SMAP?
As of March 12, 2026, XJH holds $342.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.21 M.
What sectors do the XJH and SMAP ETFs invest in?
XJH leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XJH ETF and SMAP ETF?
XJH top holdings include CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CURTISS WRIGHT and STIFEL FINANCIAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: XJH or SMAP?
XJH holds 356 securities with 12.01% of its assets in the top 15. SMAP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.75%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
