Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XJHvsSCHMETF Comparison
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. XJH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.04% for SCHM. XJH is up 1.04% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. SCHM performs better with 2.81% YTD performance, and +$178M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJH and SCHM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XJH vs SCHM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJH SCHM | -5.82%-4.10% | -0.23%+1.55% | +1.04%+2.81% | +17.11%+20.39% | +43.67%+49.13% | +31.91%+31.79% |
| Flows | XJH SCHM | +$7M+$215M | +$7M+$224M | +$5M+$178M | +$49M+$195M | +$182M-$229M | +$275M+$1.37B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJH SCHM | +15.90%+15.49% | +21.08%+21.33% | +18.24%+17.78% | +19.82%+19.56% |
| Max drawdown | XJH SCHM | -7.61%-6.73% | -15.00%-15.46% | -24.38%-23.35% | -24.99%-26.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | XJH SCHM | 18d14d | 46d46d | 379d283d | 815d855d |
XJH | SCHM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:15 PM | $45.20 | $30.83 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $45.02 | $30.91 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XJH | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XJH | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.20 | $30.83 |
| 1D performance | +0.40% | -0.26% |
| AuM | $342.46 M | $12.82 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.04% |
XJH | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index | Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 346 | 452 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2020 | January 13, 2011 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XJH and SCHM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, XJH is up 1.04% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHM has returned 2.81%. That puts SCHM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XJH or SCHM?
Year-to-date, the XJH ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$178M for SCHM.
Which ETF is more volatile: XJH or SCHM?
Over the past year, XJH had a volatility of 21.08%, while SCHM experienced 21.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: XJH or SCHM?
As of March 12, 2026, XJH holds $342.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHM manages $12.82 B.
What sectors do the XJH and SCHM ETFs invest in?
XJH leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, SCHM focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the XJH ETF and SCHM ETF?
XJH top holdings include CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. SCHM holds in its top three: US80004C2008, CIENA and US19247G1076.
Which ETF is more diversified: XJH or SCHM?
XJH holds 356 securities with 12.01% of its assets in the top 15. SCHM has 498 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.79%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
