XJHvsQVMMETF Comparison
VS
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. XJH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.15% for QVMM. XJH is up 14.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35M in YTD flows. QVMM performs better with 14.64% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJH and QVMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XJH vs QVMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJH QVMM | -2.06%-2.01% | +5.56%+4.59% | +14.17%+14.64% | +19.49%+19.64% | +42.32%+45.49% | +45.52%+49.47% |
| Flows | XJH QVMM | +$8M- | +$30M- | +$35M+$2M | +$63M-$965K | +$216M+$36M | +$292M+$98M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJH QVMM | +15.39%+15.16% | +16.20%+15.51% | +18.19%+17.79% | +19.78%+19.36% |
| Max drawdown | XJH QVMM | -4.42%-4.70% | -9.65%-8.41% | -24.38%-23.85% | -24.99%-23.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | XJH QVMM | 16d26d | 53d42d | 379d379d | 815d379d |
Trading data
XJH | QVMM | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.15 | $35.32 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $50.77 | $35.03 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XJH | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XJH | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.15 | $35.32 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | +0.82% |
| AuM | $415.66 M | $425.51 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
XJH | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 359 | 360 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2020 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XJH
USA
95.38%
Other
4.62%
QVMM
USA
96.32%
Other
3.68%
Sectors
XJH
Finance
23.46%
Industrials
19.21%
Technology
15.87%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.35%
Healthcare
9.47%
Other
21.64%
QVMM
Finance
22.85%
Industrials
20.27%
Technology
13.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.98%
Healthcare
7.49%
Other
24.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
XJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.56%
QVMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
XJH
Twilio, Inc.
0.97%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.95%
MKS, Inc.
0.93%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.87%
nVent Electric Plc
0.85%
Entegris, Inc.
0.85%
ATI, Inc.
0.83%
Illumina, Inc.
0.82%
TechnipFMC plc
0.82%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.80%
MasTec, Inc.
0.79%
Woodward, Inc.
0.78%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.77%
Everpure, Inc.
0.77%
XPO, Inc.
0.75%
QVMM
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.87%
nVent Electric Plc
0.85%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.84%
MasTec, Inc.
0.83%
Illumina, Inc.
0.82%
MKS, Inc.
0.81%
Twilio, Inc.
0.81%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.80%
Entegris, Inc.
0.80%
Everpure, Inc.
0.79%
ATI, Inc.
0.78%
TechnipFMC plc
0.77%
Woodward, Inc.
0.74%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.74%
United Therapeutics Corp.
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about XJH and QVMM
How have the XJH and QVMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, XJH is up 14.17% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMM has returned 14.64%. That puts QVMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XJH or QVMM?
Year-to-date, the XJH ETF saw +$35M in flows, compared to +$2M for QVMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: XJH or QVMM?
Over the past year, XJH had a volatility of 16.2%, while QVMM experienced 15.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: XJH or QVMM?
As of July 29, 2026, XJH holds $415.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVMM manages $425.51 M.
What sectors do the XJH and QVMM ETFs invest in?
XJH leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, QVMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the XJH ETF and QVMM ETF?
XJH top holdings include Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and MKS, Inc.. QVMM holds in its top three: Curtiss-Wright Corp., nVent Electric Plc and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XJH or QVMM?
XJH holds 359 securities with 12.56% of its assets in the top 15. QVMM has 360 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.99%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
