Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XJHvsQVMMETF Comparison
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. XJH's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, QVMM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. XJH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.15% for QVMM. XJH is up 3.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. QVMM performs better with 4.58% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJH and QVMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XJH vs QVMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJH QVMM | -5.01%-4.07% | +2.12%+2.92% | +3.65%+4.58% | +19.15%+20.35% | +44.53%+47.43% | +38.65%n/a |
| Flows | XJH QVMM | +$7M+$3M | +$7M+$3M | +$5M+$3M | +$49M+$168K | +$182M+$31M | +$275M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJH QVMM | +15.59%+14.57% | +20.97%+20.57% | +18.24%+17.91% | +19.81%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XJH QVMM | -5.76%-5.07% | -15.00%-14.90% | -24.38%-23.85% | -24.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XJH QVMM | 16d8d | 46d46d | 379d379d | 815dn/a |
XJH | QVMM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.04 | $32.08 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $46.28 | $32.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XJH | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XJH | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.04 | $32.08 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.22% |
| AuM | $351.32 M | $391.84 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.15% |
XJH | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 346 | 345 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2020 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XJH and QVMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, XJH is up 3.65% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMM has returned 4.58%. That puts QVMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XJH or QVMM?
Year-to-date, the XJH ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$3M for QVMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: XJH or QVMM?
Over the past year, XJH had a volatility of 20.97%, while QVMM experienced 20.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: XJH or QVMM?
As of March 10, 2026, XJH holds $351.32 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVMM manages $391.84 M.
What sectors do the XJH and QVMM ETFs invest in?
XJH leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, QVMM focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the XJH ETF and QVMM ETF?
XJH top holdings include CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. QVMM holds in its top three: CIENA, PURE STORAGE and US19247G1076.
Which ETF is more diversified: XJH or QVMM?
XJH holds 356 securities with 12.01% of its assets in the top 15. QVMM has 358 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.29%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
