XJHvsPAMCETF Comparison
VS
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. XJH's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, PAMC's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. XJH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.6% for PAMC. XJH is up 14.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35M in YTD flows. PAMC performs better with 14.25% YTD performance, and -$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJH and PAMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XJH vs PAMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJH PAMC | -2.06%-3.69% | +5.56%+3.40% | +14.17%+14.25% | +19.49%+19.96% | +42.32%+50.85% | +45.52%+55.40% |
| Flows | XJH PAMC | +$8M- | +$30M-$11M | +$35M-$11M | +$63M-$20M | +$216M-$947K | +$292M-$5M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJH PAMC | +15.39%+18.18% | +16.20%+18.95% | +18.19%+18.56% | +19.78%+20.34% |
| Max drawdown | XJH PAMC | -4.42%-4.82% | -9.65%-10.32% | -24.38%-25.78% | -24.99%-26.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | XJH PAMC | 16d16d | 53d89d | 379d422d | 815d801d |
Trading data
XJH | PAMC | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.15 | $53.76 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $50.77 | $53.06 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XJH | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XJH | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.15 | $53.76 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | +1.32% |
| AuM | $415.66 M | $53.06 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
XJH | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 359 | 151 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2020 | June 24, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XJH
USA
95.38%
Other
4.62%
PAMC
USA
93.62%
Other
6.38%
Sectors
XJH
Finance
23.46%
Industrials
19.21%
Technology
15.87%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.35%
Healthcare
9.47%
Other
21.64%
PAMC
Finance
25.1%
Industrials
20.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.49%
Technology
10.9%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.26%
Energy
7.78%
Other
14.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
XJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.56%
PAMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
XJH
Twilio, Inc.
0.97%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.95%
MKS, Inc.
0.93%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.87%
nVent Electric Plc
0.85%
Entegris, Inc.
0.85%
ATI, Inc.
0.83%
Illumina, Inc.
0.82%
TechnipFMC plc
0.82%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.80%
MasTec, Inc.
0.79%
Woodward, Inc.
0.78%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.77%
Everpure, Inc.
0.77%
XPO, Inc.
0.75%
PAMC
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.16%
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
2.08%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.79%
ATI, Inc.
1.78%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
1.68%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
1.66%
Woodward, Inc.
1.64%
TechnipFMC plc
1.63%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.55%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
1.42%
nVent Electric Plc
1.41%
MKS, Inc.
1.40%
Performance Food Group Co.
1.33%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.29%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.28%
Frequently asked questions about XJH and PAMC
How have the XJH and PAMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, XJH is up 14.17% year-to-date (YTD), while PAMC has returned 14.25%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XJH or PAMC?
Year-to-date, the XJH ETF saw +$35M in flows, compared to -$11M for PAMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: XJH or PAMC?
Over the past year, XJH had a volatility of 16.2%, while PAMC experienced 18.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: XJH or PAMC?
As of July 29, 2026, XJH holds $415.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAMC manages $53.06 M.
What sectors do the XJH and PAMC ETFs invest in?
XJH leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, PAMC focuses on Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the XJH ETF and PAMC ETF?
XJH top holdings include Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and MKS, Inc.. PAMC holds in its top three: Curtiss-Wright Corp., Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XJH or PAMC?
XJH holds 359 securities with 12.56% of its assets in the top 15. PAMC has 151 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
