Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XITKvsFNGSETF Comparison
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) belong to the same industry segment: Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity. XITK's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. In contrast, FNGS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. XITK is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.58% for FNGS. XITK is down -15.32% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. FNGS performs better with -5.13% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XITK and FNGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XITK vs FNGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XITK FNGS | +1.36%+2.47% | -14.51%-9.27% | -15.32%-5.13% | -5.57%+27.72% | +39.71%+178.70% | -33.23%+120.32% |
| Flows | XITK FNGS | -$3M- | -$6M- | -$6M- | -$29M- | -$73M+$206M | -$227M+$206M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XITK FNGS | +29.20%+19.44% | +28.24%+26.72% | +26.29%+25.51% | +32.59%+29.95% |
| Max drawdown | XITK FNGS | -23.11%-14.74% | -27.50%-17.87% | -28.02%-26.06% | -61.56%-48.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | XITK FNGS | 65d90d | 172d133d | 211d105d | 1604d617d |
XITK | FNGS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $150.91 | $62.51 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $151.08 | $63.85 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XITK | FNGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XITK | FNGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $150.91 | $62.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -2.10% |
| AuM | $58.89 M | $484.75 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.58% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10
Top 15 holdings
How have the XITK and FNGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, XITK is down -15.32% year-to-date (YTD), while FNGS has lost -5.13%. That puts FNGS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XITK or FNGS?
Year-to-date, the XITK ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to - for FNGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: XITK or FNGS?
Over the past year, XITK had a volatility of 28.24%, while FNGS experienced 26.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: XITK or FNGS?
As of March 13, 2026, XITK holds $58.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNGS manages $484.75 M.
What sectors do the XITK and FNGS ETFs invest in?
XITK leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Communication Services. Meanwhile, FNGS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the XITK ETF and FNGS ETF?
XITK top holdings include SKYWATER TECHNOLOGY, ACM RESEARCH and NOVA. FNGS holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: XITK or FNGS?
XITK holds 100 securities with 20.89% of its assets in the top 15. FNGS has 10 securities.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
