Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XHSvsPJPETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) belong to the same industry segment: US Health Care. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. XHS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.57% for PJP. XHS is down -1.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. PJP performs better with 1.42% YTD performance, and +$89M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XHS and PJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XHS vs PJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XHS PJP | -0.71%-2.82% | -2.04%+1.11% | -1.55%+1.42% | +11.15%+24.63% | +26.55%+48.26% | +1.67%+41.72% |
| Flows | XHS PJP | -$8M+$6M | +$2M+$93M | +$6M+$89M | -$3M+$91M | -$36M+$6M | -$38M-$49M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XHS PJP | +17.76%+14.68% | +19.20%+18.64% | +18.15%+15.30% | +21.13%+15.87% |
| Max drawdown | XHS PJP | -5.98%-5.17% | -12.54%-13.71% | -17.78%-16.11% | -32.53%-17.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | XHS PJP | 63d30d | 128d130d | 362d275d | 1716d788d |
XHS | PJP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $104.90 | $105.46 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $105.14 | $106.08 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XHS | PJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XHS | PJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $104.90 | $105.46 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.58% |
| AuM | $87.35 M | $408.16 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.57% |
XHS | PJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index | Dynamic Pharmaceutical Intellidex Index |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 29 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2011 | June 23, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XHS and PJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, XHS is down -1.55% year-to-date (YTD), while PJP has returned 1.42%. That puts PJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XHS or PJP?
Year-to-date, the XHS ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$89M for PJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: XHS or PJP?
Over the past year, XHS had a volatility of 19.2%, while PJP experienced 18.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: XHS or PJP?
As of March 10, 2026, XHS holds $87.35 M in assets under management (AUM), while PJP manages $408.16 M.
What sectors do the XHS and PJP ETFs invest in?
XHS leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, PJP focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the XHS ETF and PJP ETF?
XHS top holdings include BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, ALIGNMENT HEALTHCARE and US20603L1026. PJP holds in its top three: GILEAD SCIENCES, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and MERCK & CO INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: XHS or PJP?
XHS holds 59 securities with 33.22% of its assets in the top 15. PJP has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.87%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
